Re: [PATCH -next] iio: imu: bmi270: Remove duplicated include in bmi270_i2c.c

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 22:31:57 -0400
Alex Lanzano <lanzano.alex@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 08:39:19AM +0800, Yang Li wrote:
> > The header files linux/module.h is included twice in bmi270_i2c.c,
> > so one inclusion of each can be removed.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=11363
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c
> > index e9025d22d5cc..71cc271cdf30 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c
> > @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/i2c.h>
> >  #include <linux/iio/iio.h>
> > -#include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
> >  #include <linux/regmap.h>  
> 
> Good catch!
> 
> Minor nit: Should remove the top module.h include instead to keep
> alphabetical ordering.
> 

Given I messed up the pull request anyway, I've snuck this one is
as an obviously fine last minute tidy up. With the other entry removed as
suggested.