From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: "Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
"Zijun Hu" <zijun_hu@icloud.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Zijun Hu" <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/6] phy: core: Fix that API devm_of_phy_provider_unregister() fails to unregister the phy provider
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:39:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241024-phy_core_fix-v2-2-fc0c63dbfcf3@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024-phy_core_fix-v2-0-fc0c63dbfcf3@quicinc.com>
From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
For devm_of_phy_provider_unregister(), its comment says it needs to invoke
of_phy_provider_unregister() to unregister the phy provider, but it does
not invoke the function actually since devres_destroy() will not call
devm_phy_provider_release() at all which will call the function, and the
missing of_phy_provider_unregister() call will case:
- The phy provider fails to be unregistered.
- Leak both memory and the OF node refcount.
Fixed by using devres_release() instead of devres_destroy() within the API.
Fixes: ff764963479a ("drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
---
drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
index f190d7126613..de07e1616b34 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
@@ -1259,12 +1259,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_phy_provider_unregister);
* of_phy_provider_unregister to unregister the phy provider.
*/
void devm_of_phy_provider_unregister(struct device *dev,
- struct phy_provider *phy_provider)
+ struct phy_provider *phy_provider)
{
int r;
- r = devres_destroy(dev, devm_phy_provider_release, devm_phy_match,
- phy_provider);
+ r = devres_release(dev, devm_phy_provider_release, devm_phy_match,
+ phy_provider);
dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, r, "couldn't find PHY provider device resource\n");
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_of_phy_provider_unregister);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-24 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-24 14:39 [PATCH v2 0/6] phy: core: Fix bugs for several APIs and simplify an API Zijun Hu
2024-10-24 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] phy: core: Fix that API devm_phy_put() fails to release the phy Zijun Hu
2024-10-29 13:40 ` Johan Hovold
2024-10-29 15:22 ` Zijun Hu
2024-10-24 14:39 ` Zijun Hu [this message]
2024-10-29 13:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] phy: core: Fix that API devm_of_phy_provider_unregister() fails to unregister the phy provider Johan Hovold
2024-10-29 15:35 ` Zijun Hu
2024-10-29 16:20 ` Johan Hovold
2024-10-24 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] phy: core: Fix that API devm_phy_destroy() fails to destroy the phy Zijun Hu
2024-10-29 13:45 ` Johan Hovold
2024-10-29 15:38 ` Zijun Hu
2024-10-24 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] phy: core: Fix an OF node refcount leakage in _of_phy_get() Zijun Hu
2024-10-29 13:47 ` Johan Hovold
2024-10-29 15:41 ` Zijun Hu
2024-10-24 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] phy: core: Fix an OF node refcount leakage in of_phy_provider_lookup() Zijun Hu
2024-10-29 13:48 ` Johan Hovold
2024-10-24 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] phy: core: Simplify API of_phy_simple_xlate() implementation Zijun Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241024-phy_core_fix-v2-2-fc0c63dbfcf3@quicinc.com \
--to=zijun_hu@icloud.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®