From: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
To: <peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
<acme@kernel.org>, <namhyung@kernel.org>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
<irogers@google.com>, <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
<kan.liang@linux.intel.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <bp@alien8.de>,
<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <ananth.narayan@amd.com>, <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
<kprateek.nayak@amd.com>, <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dhananjay Ugwekar" <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 04/10] perf/x86/rapl: Rename rapl_pmu variables
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 11:13:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241025111348.3810-5-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241025111348.3810-1-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Rename struct rapl_pmu variables from "pmu" to "rapl_pmu", to
avoid any confusion between the variables of two different
structs pmu and rapl_pmu. As rapl_pmu also contains a pointer to
struct pmu, which leads to situations in code like pmu->pmu,
which is needlessly confusing. Above scenario is replaced with
much more readable rapl_pmu->pmu with this change.
Also rename "pmus" member in rapl_pmus struct, for same reason.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
---
arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
index d20c5b1dd0ad..7387bca95018 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ struct rapl_pmu {
struct rapl_pmus {
struct pmu pmu;
unsigned int nr_rapl_pmu;
- struct rapl_pmu *pmus[] __counted_by(nr_rapl_pmu);
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu[] __counted_by(nr_rapl_pmu);
};
enum rapl_unit_quirk {
@@ -223,34 +223,34 @@ static void rapl_start_hrtimer(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
static enum hrtimer_restart rapl_hrtimer_handle(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = container_of(hrtimer, struct rapl_pmu, hrtimer);
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = container_of(hrtimer, struct rapl_pmu, hrtimer);
struct perf_event *event;
unsigned long flags;
- if (!pmu->n_active)
+ if (!rapl_pmu->n_active)
return HRTIMER_NORESTART;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rapl_pmu->lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry(event, &pmu->active_list, active_entry)
+ list_for_each_entry(event, &rapl_pmu->active_list, active_entry)
rapl_event_update(event);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rapl_pmu->lock, flags);
- hrtimer_forward_now(hrtimer, pmu->timer_interval);
+ hrtimer_forward_now(hrtimer, rapl_pmu->timer_interval);
return HRTIMER_RESTART;
}
-static void rapl_hrtimer_init(struct rapl_pmu *pmu)
+static void rapl_hrtimer_init(struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu)
{
- struct hrtimer *hr = &pmu->hrtimer;
+ struct hrtimer *hr = &rapl_pmu->hrtimer;
hrtimer_init(hr, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
hr->function = rapl_hrtimer_handle;
}
-static void __rapl_pmu_event_start(struct rapl_pmu *pmu,
+static void __rapl_pmu_event_start(struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu,
struct perf_event *event)
{
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(event->hw.state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)))
@@ -258,39 +258,39 @@ static void __rapl_pmu_event_start(struct rapl_pmu *pmu,
event->hw.state = 0;
- list_add_tail(&event->active_entry, &pmu->active_list);
+ list_add_tail(&event->active_entry, &rapl_pmu->active_list);
local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, rapl_read_counter(event));
- pmu->n_active++;
- if (pmu->n_active == 1)
- rapl_start_hrtimer(pmu);
+ rapl_pmu->n_active++;
+ if (rapl_pmu->n_active == 1)
+ rapl_start_hrtimer(rapl_pmu);
}
static void rapl_pmu_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = event->pmu_private;
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = event->pmu_private;
unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
- __rapl_pmu_event_start(pmu, event);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rapl_pmu->lock, flags);
+ __rapl_pmu_event_start(rapl_pmu, event);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rapl_pmu->lock, flags);
}
static void rapl_pmu_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = event->pmu_private;
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = event->pmu_private;
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rapl_pmu->lock, flags);
/* mark event as deactivated and stopped */
if (!(hwc->state & PERF_HES_STOPPED)) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(pmu->n_active <= 0);
- pmu->n_active--;
- if (pmu->n_active == 0)
- hrtimer_cancel(&pmu->hrtimer);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(rapl_pmu->n_active <= 0);
+ rapl_pmu->n_active--;
+ if (rapl_pmu->n_active == 0)
+ hrtimer_cancel(&rapl_pmu->hrtimer);
list_del(&event->active_entry);
@@ -308,23 +308,23 @@ static void rapl_pmu_event_stop(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
hwc->state |= PERF_HES_UPTODATE;
}
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rapl_pmu->lock, flags);
}
static int rapl_pmu_event_add(struct perf_event *event, int mode)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu = event->pmu_private;
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu = event->pmu_private;
struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rapl_pmu->lock, flags);
hwc->state = PERF_HES_UPTODATE | PERF_HES_STOPPED;
if (mode & PERF_EF_START)
- __rapl_pmu_event_start(pmu, event);
+ __rapl_pmu_event_start(rapl_pmu, event);
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rapl_pmu->lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
{
u64 cfg = event->attr.config & RAPL_EVENT_MASK;
int bit, rapl_pmu_idx, ret = 0;
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu;
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu;
/* only look at RAPL events */
if (event->attr.type != rapl_pmus->pmu.type)
@@ -370,10 +370,11 @@ static int rapl_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
return -EINVAL;
/* must be done before validate_group */
- pmu = rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx];
- if (!pmu)
+ rapl_pmu = rapl_pmus->rapl_pmu[rapl_pmu_idx];
+ if (!rapl_pmu)
return -EINVAL;
- event->pmu_private = pmu;
+
+ event->pmu_private = rapl_pmu;
event->hw.event_base = rapl_msrs[bit].msr;
event->hw.config = cfg;
event->hw.idx = bit;
@@ -600,7 +601,7 @@ static void cleanup_rapl_pmus(void)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < rapl_pmus->nr_rapl_pmu; i++)
- kfree(rapl_pmus->pmus[i]);
+ kfree(rapl_pmus->rapl_pmu[i]);
kfree(rapl_pmus);
}
@@ -615,27 +616,27 @@ static const struct attribute_group *rapl_attr_update[] = {
static int __init init_rapl_pmu(void)
{
- struct rapl_pmu *pmu;
+ struct rapl_pmu *rapl_pmu;
int idx;
for (idx = 0; idx < rapl_pmus->nr_rapl_pmu; idx++) {
- pmu = kzalloc(sizeof(*pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!pmu)
+ rapl_pmu = kzalloc(sizeof(*rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!rapl_pmu)
goto free;
- raw_spin_lock_init(&pmu->lock);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pmu->active_list);
- pmu->pmu = &rapl_pmus->pmu;
- pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
- rapl_hrtimer_init(pmu);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&rapl_pmu->lock);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rapl_pmu->active_list);
+ rapl_pmu->pmu = &rapl_pmus->pmu;
+ rapl_pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
+ rapl_hrtimer_init(rapl_pmu);
- rapl_pmus->pmus[idx] = pmu;
+ rapl_pmus->rapl_pmu[idx] = rapl_pmu;
}
return 0;
free:
for (; idx > 0; idx--)
- kfree(rapl_pmus->pmus[idx - 1]);
+ kfree(rapl_pmus->rapl_pmu[idx - 1]);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -649,7 +650,7 @@ static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
rapl_pmu_scope = PERF_PMU_SCOPE_DIE;
}
- rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
+ rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, rapl_pmu, nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rapl_pmus)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-25 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-25 11:13 [PATCH v6 00/10] Add RAPL core energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the unused get_rapl_pmu_cpumask() function Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 6:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-28 6:38 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01 7:20 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] x86/topology: Introduce topology_logical_core_id() Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 8:27 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the cpu_to_rapl_pmu() function Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 8:53 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-28 9:19 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01 8:06 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-11-04 3:15 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-04 7:15 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-11-04 8:04 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01 7:28 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` Dhananjay Ugwekar [this message]
2024-10-28 9:01 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] perf/x86/rapl: Rename rapl_pmu variables Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01 7:29 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] perf/x86/rapl: Make rapl_model struct global Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-01 7:29 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-11-08 10:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] perf/x86/rapl: Add arguments to the init and cleanup functions Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 12:31 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01 7:29 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] perf/x86/rapl: Modify the generic variable names to *_pkg* Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 14:27 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01 7:29 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the global variable rapl_msrs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 14:35 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01 7:30 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] perf/x86/rapl: Move the cntr_mask to rapl_pmus struct Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-10-28 14:54 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2024-11-01 7:37 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-10-25 11:13 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] perf/x86/rapl: Add core energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-11-08 9:52 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241025111348.3810-5-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--to=dhananjay.ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®