mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org.com>
Subject: [patch 1/2] sched: Initialize idle tasks only once
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 11:43:42 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241028103142.359584747@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241028103006.008053168@linutronix.de>

Idle tasks are initialized via __sched_fork() twice:

     fork_idle()
        copy_process()
	  sched_fork()
             __sched_fork()
	init_idle()
          __sched_fork()
  
Instead of cleaning this up, sched_ext hacked around it. Even when analyis
and solution were provided in a discussion, nobody cared to clean this up.

init_idle() is also invoked from sched_init() to initialize the boot CPU's
idle task, which requires the __sched_fork() invocation. But this can be
trivially solved by invoking __sched_fork() before init_idle() in
sched_init() and removing the __sched_fork() invocation from init_idle().

Do so and clean up the comments explaining this historical leftover.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8734p4ymqj.ffs@tglx
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |   12 +++++-------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4424,7 +4424,8 @@ int wake_up_state(struct task_struct *p,
  * Perform scheduler related setup for a newly forked process p.
  * p is forked by current.
  *
- * __sched_fork() is basic setup used by init_idle() too:
+ * __sched_fork() is basic setup which is also used by sched_init() to
+ * initialize the boot CPU's idle task.
  */
 static void __sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
 {
@@ -7680,8 +7681,6 @@ void __init init_idle(struct task_struct
 	struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	__sched_fork(0, idle);
-
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&idle->pi_lock, flags);
 	raw_spin_rq_lock(rq);
 
@@ -7696,10 +7695,8 @@ void __init init_idle(struct task_struct
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	/*
-	 * It's possible that init_idle() gets called multiple times on a task,
-	 * in that case do_set_cpus_allowed() will not do the right thing.
-	 *
-	 * And since this is boot we can forgo the serialization.
+	 * No validation and serialization required at boot time and for
+	 * setting up the idle tasks of not yet online CPUs.
 	 */
 	set_cpus_allowed_common(idle, &ac);
 #endif
@@ -8543,6 +8540,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
 	 * but because we are the idle thread, we just pick up running again
 	 * when this runqueue becomes "idle".
 	 */
+	__sched_fork(0, current);
 	init_idle(current, smp_processor_id());
 
 	calc_load_update = jiffies + LOAD_FREQ;


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-28 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-28 10:43 [patch 0/2] sched: Cleanup idle task double initialization Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-28 10:43 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-11-06 10:48   ` [tip: sched/core] sched: Initialize idle tasks only once tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-28 10:43 ` [patch 2/2] sched/ext: Remove sched_fork() hack Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-28 12:30   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2024-10-28 12:58     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-28 13:20   ` [patch v1A " Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-28 17:37     ` Tejun Heo
2024-11-06 10:48     ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241028103142.359584747@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®