mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>
To: longman@redhat.com, ming.lei@redhat.com, pauld@redhat.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
	"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Zefan Li" <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Vincent Guittot" <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Dietmar Eggemann" <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	"Ben Segall" <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	"Costa Shulyupin" <costa.shul@redhat.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] sched/isolation: Add infrastructure for dynamic CPU isolation
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 14:05:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241029120534.3983734-2-costa.shul@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241029120534.3983734-1-costa.shul@redhat.com>

Introduce the infrastructure function housekeeping_update()
to modify housekeeping_cpumask at runtime and update the
configurations of dependent subsystems accordingly in
following patches.

Parent patch:
sched/isolation: Exclude dynamically isolated CPUs from housekeeping masks
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240821142312.236970-1-longman@redhat.com/

Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>

---

Note: In theory, updating housekeeping.flags only once is possible.
However, this approach would make this and following code less clear
and harder to follow and review.

Changes in v3:
- Remove redundant WRITE_ONCE. The first WRITE_ONCE is located
in housekeeping_update() because this function will
update dependent subsystems with changes of the housekeeping masks.

Changes in v2:
- remove unnecessary `err` variable
- add for_each_clear_bit... to clear isolated CPUs
- Address Gleixner's comments:
- use WRITE_ONCE to change housekeeping.flags
- use `struct cpumask *update` in signature of housekeeping_update

v1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240516190437.3545310-2-costa.shul@redhat.com/
---
 kernel/sched/isolation.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index 2ee47bc25aea..ebbb215505e8 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -127,6 +127,40 @@ static void __init housekeeping_setup_type(enum hk_type type,
 		     housekeeping_staging);
 }
 
+/*
+ * housekeeping_update - change housekeeping.cpumasks[type] and propagate the
+ * change.
+ */
+static int housekeeping_update(enum hk_type type, const struct cpumask *update)
+{
+	struct {
+		struct cpumask changed;
+		struct cpumask enable;
+		struct cpumask disable;
+	} *masks;
+
+	masks = kmalloc(sizeof(*masks), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!masks)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+	cpumask_xor(&masks->changed, housekeeping_cpumask(type), update);
+	cpumask_and(&masks->enable, &masks->changed, update);
+	cpumask_andnot(&masks->disable, &masks->changed, update);
+	cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], update);
+	WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, housekeeping.flags | BIT(type));
+	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
+		static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden.key);
+
+	/* Add here code to update dependent subsystems with
+	 * changes of the housekeeping masks.
+	 */
+
+	kfree(masks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	cpumask_var_t non_housekeeping_mask, housekeeping_staging;
@@ -330,10 +364,12 @@ int housekeeping_exlude_isolcpus(const struct cpumask *isolcpus, unsigned long f
 		/*
 		 * Reset housekeeping to bootup default
 		 */
+
+		for_each_clear_bit(type, &boot_hk_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
+			housekeeping_update(type, cpu_possible_mask);
 		for_each_set_bit(type, &boot_hk_flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
-			cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], boot_hk_cpumask);
+			housekeeping_update(type, boot_hk_cpumask);
 
-		WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, boot_hk_flags);
 		if (!boot_hk_flags && static_key_enabled(&housekeeping_overridden))
 			static_key_disable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden.key);
 		return 0;
@@ -358,9 +394,8 @@ int housekeeping_exlude_isolcpus(const struct cpumask *isolcpus, unsigned long f
 		cpumask_andnot(tmp_mask, src_mask, isolcpus);
 		if (!cpumask_intersects(tmp_mask, cpu_online_mask))
 			return -EINVAL;	/* Invalid isolated CPUs */
-		cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], tmp_mask);
+		housekeeping_update(type, tmp_mask);
 	}
-	WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, boot_hk_flags | flags);
 	excluded = true;
 	if (!static_key_enabled(&housekeeping_overridden))
 		static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden.key);
-- 
2.47.0


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-29 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-29 12:05 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] genirq/cpuhotplug: Adjust managed interrupts according to change of housekeeping cpumask Costa Shulyupin
2024-10-29 12:05 ` Costa Shulyupin [this message]
2024-10-29 12:05 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/3] DO NOT MERGE: test for managed irqs adjustment Costa Shulyupin
2024-10-29 12:05 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/3] genirq/cpuhotplug: Adjust managed irqs according to change of housekeeping CPU Costa Shulyupin
2024-10-29 18:54   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-01-06 14:39     ` Costa Shulyupin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-09-16 12:20 [RFC PATCH v3 0/3] genirq/cpuhotplug: Adjust managed interrupts according to change of housekeeping cpumask Costa Shulyupin
2024-09-16 12:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/3] sched/isolation: Add infrastructure for dynamic CPU isolation Costa Shulyupin
2024-10-02  9:44   ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241029120534.3983734-2-costa.shul@redhat.com \
    --to=costa.shul@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®