From: Qiu-ji Chen <chenqiuji666@gmail.com>
To: amit@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
baijiaju1990@gmail.com, Qiu-ji Chen <chenqiuji666@gmail.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] virtio: console: Fix atomicity violation in fill_readbuf()
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 14:49:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241030064949.6255-1-chenqiuji666@gmail.com> (raw)
The atomicity violation issue is due to the invalidation of the function
port_has_data()'s check caused by concurrency. Imagine a scenario where a
port that contains data passes the validity check but is simultaneously
assigned a value with no data. This could result in an empty port passing
the validity check, potentially leading to a null pointer dereference
error later in the program, which is inconsistent.
To address this issue, we added a separate validity check for the variable
buf after its assignment. This ensures that an invalid buf does not proceed
further into the program, thereby preventing a null pointer dereference
error.
This possible bug is found by an experimental static analysis tool
developed by our team. This tool analyzes the locking APIs
to extract function pairs that can be concurrently executed, and then
analyzes the instructions in the paired functions to identify possible
concurrency bugs including data races and atomicity violations.
Fixes: 203baab8ba31 ("virtio: console: Introduce function to hand off data from host to readers")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Qiu-ji Chen <chenqiuji666@gmail.com>
---
V2:
The logic of the fix has been modified.
---
drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
index c62b208b42f1..54fee192d93c 100644
--- a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
+++ b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
@@ -660,6 +660,10 @@ static ssize_t fill_readbuf(struct port *port, u8 __user *out_buf,
return 0;
buf = port->inbuf;
+
+ if (!buf)
+ return 0;
+
out_count = min(out_count, buf->len - buf->offset);
if (to_user) {
--
2.34.1
reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241030064949.6255-1-chenqiuji666@gmail.com \
--to=chenqiuji666@gmail.com \
--cc=amit@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®