mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
To: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89@gmail.com>,
	Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@igalia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/sched: Improve teardown documentation
Date: Tue,  5 Nov 2024 15:31:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241105143137.71893-2-pstanner@redhat.com> (raw)

If jobs are still enqueued in struct drm_gpu_scheduler.pending_list
when drm_sched_fini() gets called, those jobs will be leaked since that
function stops both job-submission and (automatic) job-cleanup. It is,
thus, up to the driver to take care of preventing leaks.

The related function drm_sched_wqueue_stop() also prevents automatic job
cleanup.

Those pitfals are not reflected in the documentation, currently.

Explicitly inform about the leak problem in the docstring of
drm_sched_fini().

Additionally, detail the purpose of drm_sched_wqueue_{start,stop} and
hint at the consequences for automatic cleanup.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
---
Hi,

in our discussion about my proposed waitque-cleanup for this problem
Sima suggested [1] that we document the problems first and by doing so get
to a consenus what the problems actually are and how we could solve
them.

This is my proposal for documenting the leaks on teardown. Feedback very
welcome.

P.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/ZtidJ8S9THvzkQ-6@phenom.ffwll.local/
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
index e97c6c60bc96..3dfa9db89484 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
@@ -1333,6 +1333,19 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_init);
  * @sched: scheduler instance
  *
  * Tears down and cleans up the scheduler.
+ *
+ * This stops submission of new jobs to the hardware through
+ * drm_sched_backend_ops.run_job(). Consequently, drm_sched_backend_ops.free_job()
+ * will not be called for all jobs still in drm_gpu_scheduler.pending_list.
+ * There is no solution for this currently. Thus, it is up to the driver to make
+ * sure that
+ *  a) drm_sched_fini() is only called after for all submitted jobs
+ *     drm_sched_backend_ops.free_job() has been called or that
+ *  b) the jobs for which drm_sched_backend_ops.free_job() has not been called
+ *     after drm_sched_fini() ran are freed manually.
+ *
+ * FIXME: Take care of the above problem and prevent this function from leaking
+ * the jobs in drm_gpu_scheduler.pending_list under any circumstances.
  */
 void drm_sched_fini(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 {
@@ -1428,8 +1441,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_wqueue_ready);
 
 /**
  * drm_sched_wqueue_stop - stop scheduler submission
- *
  * @sched: scheduler instance
+ *
+ * Stops the scheduler from pulling new jobs from entities. It also stops
+ * freeing jobs automatically through drm_sched_backend_ops.free_job().
  */
 void drm_sched_wqueue_stop(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 {
@@ -1441,8 +1456,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_sched_wqueue_stop);
 
 /**
  * drm_sched_wqueue_start - start scheduler submission
- *
  * @sched: scheduler instance
+ *
+ * Restarts the scheduler after drm_sched_wqueue_stop() has stopped it.
+ *
+ * This function is not necessary for 'conventional' startup. The scheduler is
+ * fully operational after drm_sched_init() succeeded.
  */
 void drm_sched_wqueue_start(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
 {
-- 
2.47.0


             reply	other threads:[~2024-11-05 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-05 14:31 Philipp Stanner [this message]
2024-11-07  9:18 ` Philipp Stanner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241105143137.71893-2-pstanner@redhat.com \
    --to=pstanner@redhat.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ltuikov89@gmail.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tursulin@igalia.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®