From: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 03/16] x86/stackprotector: Remove stack protector test scripts
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2024 10:57:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241105155801.1779119-4-brgerst@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241105155801.1779119-1-brgerst@gmail.com>
With GCC 8.1 now the minimum supported compiler for x86, these scripts
are no longer needed.
Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/Kconfig | 11 +----------
scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh | 8 --------
scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh | 4 ----
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 22 deletions(-)
delete mode 100755 scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
delete mode 100755 scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh
diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index aa7fac6817c5..45021d57fd9f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ config X86
select HAVE_FUNCTION_ARG_ACCESS_API
select HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
select HAVE_SOFTIRQ_ON_OWN_STACK
- select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR if CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR
+ select HAVE_STACKPROTECTOR
select HAVE_STACK_VALIDATION if HAVE_OBJTOOL
select HAVE_STATIC_CALL
select HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE if HAVE_OBJTOOL
@@ -418,15 +418,6 @@ config PGTABLE_LEVELS
default 3 if X86_PAE
default 2
-config CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR
- bool
- default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS)) if 64BIT
- default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS))
- help
- We have to make sure stack protector is unconditionally disabled if
- the compiler produces broken code or if it does not let us control
- the segment on 32-bit kernels.
-
menu "Processor type and features"
config SMP
diff --git a/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh b/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
deleted file mode 100755
index 9459ca4f0f11..000000000000
--- a/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-
-# This requires GCC 8.1 or better. Specifically, we require
-# -mstack-protector-guard-reg, added by
-# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
-
-echo "int foo(void) { char X[200]; return 3; }" | $* -S -x c -m32 -O0 -fstack-protector -mstack-protector-guard-reg=fs -mstack-protector-guard-symbol=__stack_chk_guard - -o - 2> /dev/null | grep -q "%fs"
diff --git a/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh b/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh
deleted file mode 100755
index f680bb01aeeb..000000000000
--- a/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
-#!/bin/sh
-# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-
-echo "int foo(void) { char X[200]; return 3; }" | $* -S -x c -m64 -O0 -mcmodel=kernel -fno-PIE -fstack-protector - -o - 2> /dev/null | grep -q "%gs"
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-05 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-05 15:57 [PATCH v5 00/16] x86-64: Stack protector and percpu improvements Brian Gerst
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] x86/stackprotector: Work around strict Clang TLS symbol requirements Brian Gerst
2024-11-05 19:30 ` Nathan Chancellor
2024-11-08 14:43 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Ard Biesheuvel
2024-12-06 11:51 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-12-06 14:09 ` Brian Gerst
2024-12-06 14:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-12-06 12:32 ` [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n Oleg Nesterov
2024-12-06 13:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-12-06 14:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-12-06 14:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-12-06 15:12 ` Brian Gerst
2024-12-06 15:17 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-10 21:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-10 22:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-11 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-11 10:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-03-11 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-11 13:13 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-11 14:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-11 17:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-11 18:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-11 19:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-11 19:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-11 21:27 ` Brian Gerst
2025-03-11 21:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2025-03-11 21:47 ` Brian Gerst
2025-03-12 9:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] x86: Raise minimum GCC version to 8.1 Brian Gerst
2024-12-05 11:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2024-12-05 16:05 ` Brian Gerst
2025-01-14 16:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-05 15:57 ` Brian Gerst [this message]
2024-11-07 13:19 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] x86/stackprotector: Remove stack protector test scripts Uros Bizjak
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] x86/boot: Disable stack protector for early boot code Brian Gerst
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] x86/pvh: Use fixed_percpu_data for early boot GSBASE Brian Gerst
2024-11-07 14:30 ` Uros Bizjak
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] x86/relocs: Handle R_X86_64_REX_GOTPCRELX relocations Brian Gerst
2024-11-07 11:20 ` Uros Bizjak
2024-11-07 11:27 ` Brian Gerst
2024-11-07 11:31 ` Uros Bizjak
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] x86/module: Deal with GOT based stack cookie load on Clang < 17 Brian Gerst
2024-11-09 9:36 ` David Laight
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] x86/stackprotector/64: Convert to normal percpu variable Brian Gerst
2024-11-07 13:29 ` Uros Bizjak
2025-02-15 14:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-15 17:38 ` Brian Gerst
2025-02-15 21:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-02-15 22:10 ` Brian Gerst
2025-02-16 8:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] x86/percpu/64: Use relative percpu offsets Brian Gerst
2024-11-07 11:28 ` Uros Bizjak
2024-11-07 12:05 ` Brian Gerst
2024-11-07 13:34 ` Uros Bizjak
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] x86/percpu/64: Remove fixed_percpu_data Brian Gerst
2024-11-07 13:32 ` Uros Bizjak
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] x86/boot/64: Remove inverse relocations Brian Gerst
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] x86/percpu/64: Remove INIT_PER_CPU macros Brian Gerst
2024-11-07 13:59 ` Uros Bizjak
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] percpu: Remove PER_CPU_FIRST_SECTION Brian Gerst
2024-11-05 15:57 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] percpu: Remove PERCPU_VADDR() Brian Gerst
2024-11-05 15:58 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] percpu: Remove __per_cpu_load Brian Gerst
2024-11-05 15:58 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] kallsyms: Remove KALLSYMS_ABSOLUTE_PERCPU Brian Gerst
2024-11-09 9:31 ` [PATCH v5 00/16] x86-64: Stack protector and percpu improvements David Laight
2024-11-09 15:11 ` Brian Gerst
2024-11-09 21:27 ` David Laight
2025-01-04 9:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241105155801.1779119-4-brgerst@gmail.com \
--to=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome