From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
To: pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
horms@kernel.org, dsahern@kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org,
kadlec@netfilter.org, roopa@nvidia.com, razor@blackwall.org,
gnault@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, hawk@kernel.org,
idosch@nvidia.com, dongml2@chinatelecom.cn,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
bridge@lists.linux.dev, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v5 5/9] net: ip: make ip_route_input_rcu() return drop reasons
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 20:55:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241107125601.1076814-6-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241107125601.1076814-1-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
In this commit, we make ip_route_input_rcu() return drop reasons, which
come from ip_route_input_mc() and ip_route_input_slow().
The only caller of ip_route_input_rcu() is ip_route_input_noref(). We
adjust it by making it return -EINVAL on error and ignore the reasons that
ip_route_input_rcu() returns. In the following patch, we will make
ip_route_input_noref() returns the drop reasons.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dongml2@chinatelecom.cn>
---
v4:
- collapse the 2 lines that we modify in inet_rtm_getroute()
---
net/ipv4/route.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index 1c4727504909..1926a8a1a83a 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -2435,9 +2435,10 @@ ip_route_input_slow(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
}
/* called with rcu_read_lock held */
-static int ip_route_input_rcu(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
- dscp_t dscp, struct net_device *dev,
- struct fib_result *res)
+static enum skb_drop_reason
+ip_route_input_rcu(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
+ dscp_t dscp, struct net_device *dev,
+ struct fib_result *res)
{
/* Multicast recognition logic is moved from route cache to here.
* The problem was that too many Ethernet cards have broken/missing
@@ -2480,23 +2481,23 @@ static int ip_route_input_rcu(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
reason = ip_route_input_mc(skb, daddr, saddr, dscp,
dev, our);
}
- return reason ? -EINVAL : 0;
+ return reason;
}
- return ip_route_input_slow(skb, daddr, saddr, dscp, dev, res) ? -EINVAL : 0;
+ return ip_route_input_slow(skb, daddr, saddr, dscp, dev, res);
}
int ip_route_input_noref(struct sk_buff *skb, __be32 daddr, __be32 saddr,
dscp_t dscp, struct net_device *dev)
{
+ enum skb_drop_reason reason;
struct fib_result res;
- int err;
rcu_read_lock();
- err = ip_route_input_rcu(skb, daddr, saddr, dscp, dev, &res);
+ reason = ip_route_input_rcu(skb, daddr, saddr, dscp, dev, &res);
rcu_read_unlock();
- return err;
+ return reason ? -EINVAL : 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ip_route_input_noref);
@@ -3308,7 +3309,7 @@ static int inet_rtm_getroute(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
skb->mark = mark;
err = ip_route_input_rcu(skb, dst, src,
inet_dsfield_to_dscp(rtm->rtm_tos),
- dev, &res);
+ dev, &res) ? -EINVAL : 0;
rt = skb_rtable(skb);
if (err == 0 && rt->dst.error)
--
2.39.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-07 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-07 12:55 [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] net: ip: add drop reasons to input route Menglong Dong
2024-11-07 12:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 1/9] net: ip: make fib_validate_source() support drop reasons Menglong Dong
2024-11-07 12:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 2/9] net: ip: make ip_route_input_mc() return drop reason Menglong Dong
2024-11-07 12:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 3/9] net: ip: make ip_mc_validate_source() " Menglong Dong
2024-11-07 12:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 4/9] net: ip: make ip_route_input_slow() return drop reasons Menglong Dong
2024-11-07 12:55 ` Menglong Dong [this message]
2024-11-07 12:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 6/9] net: ip: make ip_route_input_noref() " Menglong Dong
2024-11-07 12:55 ` [PATCH net-next v5 7/9] net: ip: make ip_route_input() " Menglong Dong
2024-11-07 12:56 ` [PATCH net-next v5 8/9] net: ip: make ip_mkroute_input/__mkroute_input " Menglong Dong
2024-11-07 12:56 ` [PATCH net-next v5 9/9] net: ip: make ip_route_use_hint() " Menglong Dong
2024-11-12 10:50 ` [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] net: ip: add drop reasons to input route patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241107125601.1076814-6-dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
--to=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dongml2@chinatelecom.cn \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
--cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®