From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA67A233D89; Fri, 8 Nov 2024 22:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731105207; cv=none; b=IpL2O5YhPmVgV+edNnjXzw+dv9ZXFansDzn9U3M5NuBEpn4Mbn+FnuI7VjlXpWT7KMREVienv8qw4XjVNfoE4En3dGpjtlZgUMJvOgrh2csoMYhpegRXrlmaw3DN5fDm0O+4aO1Ztxb3Gf9E1gj2P/XODL0BGhlHlzAd6oRwbwU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731105207; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+LF7CsJ7/io270zqeQKsXvXgBShIfl+NXbOKX6jVzM4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GEv8HUBiabPCysnhVbUMN67e7bDbnbTNbOkhKdn8GN6+ir0tJeYn29PAV//9YZA/ms1nM8grco2NJkT8wa2CPlaweaKypY8eqQJZlGhzTRxrvghJPOeJ4l5jbZoYCQqll9qwtkE/1jFqi6D8T0pT7SGneMyQeCDl9DrktQXyskI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=DgqwLv0T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="DgqwLv0T" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731105206; x=1762641206; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+LF7CsJ7/io270zqeQKsXvXgBShIfl+NXbOKX6jVzM4=; b=DgqwLv0T9pPicR6S1TQsJkz/8RW9iWhzNzdz3abrEN7af1r7MYjUFKlA LXKwKK0Ox/kbg0EqnMufscSbAPNkaotm9UHqL5Ig62ZawXg82SVHwRWof bXxBip7/udTm11VpO9UQDoYo0eWdOXSLX5VTChA/RSfs/01dsGX4HNOKc hQ/qIBZEHGNHV8Gk5Ajh4cTZpT1t/V4dezcCsFxWvseu86QNRd1EawnJh 2W6Q7XhuWKv7G4AUOp8aNvQJclqEufxAzp7GFy5nrXgortBJ4d0p4Z2+D Qb4U34jazjI431m4xuny3XjbpQQYQpk3uhMTwFKIFYkeftQ+9y7UDxGXu g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ivD9u5uHQ4efH0JvPrZ5SA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: NEqYNUdxRoSzdoolNSbTXw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11250"; a="30417942" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,139,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="30417942" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 08 Nov 2024 14:33:25 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: sJHMUEGrSS6OVqSv/oK2bw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MBjI+FrtT1iEbSuKCrdJWw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,139,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="90867165" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a48cf1aa22e8) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Nov 2024 14:33:21 -0800 Received: from kbuild by a48cf1aa22e8 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1t9XXb-000rqk-0O; Fri, 08 Nov 2024 22:33:19 +0000 Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2024 06:33:11 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Yoshihiro Furudera , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , Jonathan Corbet , Catalin Marinas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Bjorn Andersson , Geert Uytterhoeven , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Dmitry Baryshkov , Konrad Dybcio , Neil Armstrong , Arnd Bergmann , =?iso-8859-1?Q?N=EDcolas_F=2E_R=2E_A=2E?= Prado , Thomas Gleixner , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf: Fujitsu: Add the Uncore PCI PMU driver Message-ID: <202411090610.oPYJJG00-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241108054006.2550856-3-fj5100bi@fujitsu.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241108054006.2550856-3-fj5100bi@fujitsu.com> Hi Yoshihiro, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on tip/smp/core] [also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.12-rc6] [cannot apply to arm64/for-next/core arm-perf/for-next/perf next-20241108] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yoshihiro-Furudera/perf-Fujitsu-Add-the-Uncore-MAC-PMU-driver/20241108-134245 base: tip/smp/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241108054006.2550856-3-fj5100bi%40fujitsu.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] perf: Fujitsu: Add the Uncore PCI PMU driver config: alpha-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241109/202411090610.oPYJJG00-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: alpha-linux-gcc (GCC) 14.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241109/202411090610.oPYJJG00-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411090610.oPYJJG00-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/perf/fujitsu_pci_pmu.c:584:36: warning: 'fujitsu_pci_pmu_acpi_match' defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=] 584 | static const struct acpi_device_id fujitsu_pci_pmu_acpi_match[] = { | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/fujitsu_pci_pmu_acpi_match +584 drivers/perf/fujitsu_pci_pmu.c 583 > 584 static const struct acpi_device_id fujitsu_pci_pmu_acpi_match[] = { 585 { "FUJI200D", }, 586 { } 587 }; 588 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, fujitsu_pci_pmu_acpi_match); 589 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki