From: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Wang <00107082@163.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net/core/net-procfs: use seq_put_decimal_ull_width() for decimal values in /proc/net/dev
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 12:52:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241110045221.4959-1-00107082@163.com> (raw)
seq_printf() is costy, when reading /proc/net/dev, profiling indicates
about 13% samples of seq_printf():
dev_seq_show(98.350% 428046/435229)
dev_seq_printf_stats(99.777% 427092/428046)
dev_get_stats(86.121% 367814/427092)
rtl8169_get_stats64(98.519% 362365/367814)
dev_fetch_sw_netstats(0.554% 2038/367814)
loopback_get_stats64(0.250% 919/367814)
dev_get_tstats64(0.077% 284/367814)
netdev_stats_to_stats64(0.051% 189/367814)
_find_next_bit(0.029% 106/367814)
seq_printf(13.719% 58594/427092)
And on a system with one wireless interface, timing for 1 million rounds of
stress reading /proc/net/dev:
real 0m51.828s
user 0m0.225s
sys 0m51.671s
On average, reading /proc/net/dev takes ~0.051ms
With this patch, extra costs parsing format string by seq_printf() can be
optimized out, and the timing for 1 million rounds of read is:
real 0m49.127s
user 0m0.295s
sys 0m48.552s
On average, ~0.048ms reading /proc/net/dev, a ~6% improvement.
Even though dev_get_stats() takes up the majority of the reading process,
the improvement is still significant;
And the improvement may vary with the physical interface on the system.
Signed-off-by: David Wang <00107082@163.com>
---
net/core/net-procfs.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/net-procfs.c b/net/core/net-procfs.c
index fa6d3969734a..a0d6c5b32b58 100644
--- a/net/core/net-procfs.c
+++ b/net/core/net-procfs.c
@@ -46,23 +46,26 @@ static void dev_seq_printf_stats(struct seq_file *seq, struct net_device *dev)
struct rtnl_link_stats64 temp;
const struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats = dev_get_stats(dev, &temp);
- seq_printf(seq, "%6s: %7llu %7llu %4llu %4llu %4llu %5llu %10llu %9llu "
- "%8llu %7llu %4llu %4llu %4llu %5llu %7llu %10llu\n",
- dev->name, stats->rx_bytes, stats->rx_packets,
- stats->rx_errors,
- stats->rx_dropped + stats->rx_missed_errors,
- stats->rx_fifo_errors,
- stats->rx_length_errors + stats->rx_over_errors +
- stats->rx_crc_errors + stats->rx_frame_errors,
- stats->rx_compressed, stats->multicast,
- stats->tx_bytes, stats->tx_packets,
- stats->tx_errors, stats->tx_dropped,
- stats->tx_fifo_errors, stats->collisions,
- stats->tx_carrier_errors +
- stats->tx_aborted_errors +
- stats->tx_window_errors +
- stats->tx_heartbeat_errors,
- stats->tx_compressed);
+ seq_printf(seq, "%6s:", dev->name);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->rx_bytes, 7);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->rx_packets, 7);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->rx_errors, 4);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->rx_dropped + stats->rx_missed_errors, 4);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->rx_fifo_errors, 4);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->rx_length_errors + stats->rx_over_errors +
+ stats->rx_crc_errors + stats->rx_frame_errors, 5);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->rx_compressed, 10);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->multicast, 9);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->tx_bytes, 8);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->tx_packets, 7);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->tx_errors, 4);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->tx_dropped, 4);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->tx_fifo_errors, 4);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->collisions, 5);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->tx_carrier_errors + stats->tx_aborted_errors +
+ stats->tx_window_errors + stats->tx_heartbeat_errors, 7);
+ seq_put_decimal_ull_width(seq, " ", stats->tx_compressed, 10);
+ seq_putc(seq, '\n');
}
/*
--
2.39.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-10 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-10 4:52 David Wang [this message]
2024-11-14 9:17 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-14 9:56 ` David Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241110045221.4959-1-00107082@163.com \
--to=00107082@163.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®