From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] rseq: Validate read-only fields under DEBUG_RSEQ config
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 11:04:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241112100419.GN22801@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241111192214.1988000-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 02:22:14PM -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
So I'm entirely agreeing with the intent, but perhaps we can argue a
little on the implementation :-)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ
> +static struct rseq *rseq_kernel_fields(struct task_struct *t)
> +{
> + return (struct rseq *) t->rseq_fields;
> +}
> +
> +static int rseq_validate_ro_fields(struct task_struct *t)
> +{
> + u32 cpu_id_start, cpu_id, node_id, mm_cid;
> + struct rseq __user *rseq = t->rseq;
> +
> + /*
> + * Validate fields which are required to be read-only by
> + * user-space.
> + */
> + if (!user_read_access_begin(rseq, t->rseq_len))
> + goto efault;
> + unsafe_get_user(cpu_id_start, &rseq->cpu_id_start, efault_end);
> + unsafe_get_user(cpu_id, &rseq->cpu_id, efault_end);
> + unsafe_get_user(node_id, &rseq->node_id, efault_end);
> + unsafe_get_user(mm_cid, &rseq->mm_cid, efault_end);
> + user_read_access_end();
> +
> + if (cpu_id_start != rseq_kernel_fields(t)->cpu_id_start)
> + printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
> + "Detected rseq cpu_id_start field corruption. Value: %u, expecting: %u (pid=%d).\n",
> + cpu_id_start, rseq_kernel_fields(t)->cpu_id_start, t->pid);
> + if (cpu_id != rseq_kernel_fields(t)->cpu_id)
> + printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
> + "Detected rseq cpu_id field corruption. Value: %u, expecting: %u (pid=%d).\n",
> + cpu_id, rseq_kernel_fields(t)->cpu_id, t->pid);
> + if (node_id != rseq_kernel_fields(t)->node_id)
> + printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
> + "Detected rseq node_id field corruption. Value: %u, expecting: %u (pid=%d).\n",
> + node_id, rseq_kernel_fields(t)->node_id, t->pid);
> + if (mm_cid != rseq_kernel_fields(t)->mm_cid)
> + printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
> + "Detected rseq mm_cid field corruption. Value: %u, expecting: %u (pid=%d).\n",
> + mm_cid, rseq_kernel_fields(t)->mm_cid, t->pid);
So aside from this just being ugly, this also has the problem of getting
the ratelimits out of sync and perhaps only showing partial corruption
for any one task.
Completely untested hackery below.
> @@ -423,6 +504,17 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(rseq, struct rseq __user *, rseq, u32, rseq_len,
> current->rseq = rseq;
> current->rseq_len = rseq_len;
> current->rseq_sig = sig;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ
> + /*
> + * Initialize the in-kernel rseq fields copy for validation of
> + * read-only fields.
> + */
> + if (get_user(rseq_kernel_fields(current)->cpu_id_start, &rseq->cpu_id_start) ||
> + get_user(rseq_kernel_fields(current)->cpu_id, &rseq->cpu_id) ||
> + get_user(rseq_kernel_fields(current)->node_id, &rseq->node_id) ||
> + get_user(rseq_kernel_fields(current)->mm_cid, &rseq->mm_cid))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +#endif
So I didn't change the above, but wouldn't it make more sense to do
rseq_reset_rseq_cpu_node_id() here, but without the validation?
---
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1364,6 +1364,15 @@ struct task_struct {
* with respect to preemption.
*/
unsigned long rseq_event_mask;
+# ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ
+ /*
+ * This is a place holder to save a copy of the rseq fields for
+ * validation of read-only fields. The struct rseq has a
+ * variable-length array at the end, so it cannot be used
+ * directly. Reserve a size large enough for the known fields.
+ */
+ char rseq_fields[sizeof(struct rseq)];
+# endif
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_MM_CID
--- a/kernel/rseq.c
+++ b/kernel/rseq.c
@@ -25,6 +25,79 @@
RSEQ_CS_FLAG_NO_RESTART_ON_SIGNAL | \
RSEQ_CS_FLAG_NO_RESTART_ON_MIGRATE)
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ
+static struct rseq *rseq_kernel_fields(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+ return (struct rseq *) t->rseq_fields;
+}
+
+static int rseq_validate_ro_fields(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+ static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(_rs,
+ DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
+ DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+ u32 cpu_id_start, cpu_id, node_id, mm_cid;
+ struct rseq __user *rseq = t->rseq;
+
+ /*
+ * Validate fields which are required to be read-only by
+ * user-space.
+ */
+ if (!user_read_access_begin(rseq, t->rseq_len))
+ goto efault;
+ unsafe_get_user(cpu_id_start, &rseq->cpu_id_start, efault_end);
+ unsafe_get_user(cpu_id, &rseq->cpu_id, efault_end);
+ unsafe_get_user(node_id, &rseq->node_id, efault_end);
+ unsafe_get_user(mm_cid, &rseq->mm_cid, efault_end);
+ user_read_access_end();
+
+ if ((cpu_id_start != rseq_kernel_fields(t)->cpu_id_start ||
+ cpu_id != rseq_kernel_fields(t)->cpu_id ||
+ node_id != rseq_kernel_fields(t)->node_id ||
+ mm_cid != rseq_kernel_fields(t)->mm_cid) && __ratelimit(&_rs)) {
+
+ pr_warn("Detected rseq corruption for pid: %d;\n"
+ " cpu_id_start: %u ?= %u\n"
+ " cpu_id: %u ?= %u\n"
+ " node_id: %u ?= %u\n"
+ " mm_cid: %u ?= %u\n"
+ t->pid,
+ cpu_id_start, rseq_kernel_fields(t)->cpu_id_start,
+ cpu_id, rseq_kernel_fields(t)->cpu_id,
+ node_id, rseq_kernel_fields(t)->node_id,
+ mm_cid, rseq_kernel_fields(t)->mm_cid);
+ }
+
+ /* For now, only print a console warning on mismatch. */
+ return 0;
+
+efault_end:
+ user_read_access_end();
+efault:
+ return -EFAULT;
+}
+
+static void rseq_set_ro_fields(struct task_struct *t, u32 cpu_id_start, u32 cpu_id,
+ u32 node_id, u32 mm_cid)
+{
+ rseq_kernel_fields(t)->cpu_id_start = cpu_id;
+ rseq_kernel_fields(t)->cpu_id = cpu_id;
+ rseq_kernel_fields(t)->node_id = node_id;
+ rseq_kernel_fields(t)->mm_cid = mm_cid;
+}
+
+#else
+static int rseq_validate_ro_fields(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void rseq_set_ro_fields(struct task_struct *t, u32 cpu_id_start, u32 cpu_id,
+ u32 node_id, u32 mm_cid)
+{
+}
+#endif
+
/*
*
* Restartable sequences are a lightweight interface that allows
@@ -92,6 +165,11 @@ static int rseq_update_cpu_node_id(struc
u32 node_id = cpu_to_node(cpu_id);
u32 mm_cid = task_mm_cid(t);
+ /*
+ * Validate read-only rseq fields.
+ */
+ if (rseq_validate_ro_fields(t))
+ goto efault;
WARN_ON_ONCE((int) mm_cid < 0);
if (!user_write_access_begin(rseq, t->rseq_len))
goto efault;
@@ -105,6 +183,7 @@ static int rseq_update_cpu_node_id(struc
* t->rseq_len != ORIG_RSEQ_SIZE.
*/
user_write_access_end();
+ rseq_set_ro_fields(t, cpu_id, cpu_id, node_id, mm_cid);
trace_rseq_update(t);
return 0;
@@ -120,6 +199,11 @@ static int rseq_reset_rseq_cpu_node_id(s
mm_cid = 0;
/*
+ * Validate read-only rseq fields.
+ */
+ if (!rseq_validate_ro_fields(t))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ /*
* Reset cpu_id_start to its initial state (0).
*/
if (put_user(cpu_id_start, &t->rseq->cpu_id_start))
@@ -141,6 +225,9 @@ static int rseq_reset_rseq_cpu_node_id(s
*/
if (put_user(mm_cid, &t->rseq->mm_cid))
return -EFAULT;
+
+ rseq_set_ro_fields(t, cpu_id_start, cpu_id, node_id, mm_cid);
+
/*
* Additional feature fields added after ORIG_RSEQ_SIZE
* need to be conditionally reset only if
@@ -423,6 +510,17 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(rseq, struct rseq __user
current->rseq = rseq;
current->rseq_len = rseq_len;
current->rseq_sig = sig;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ
+ /*
+ * Initialize the in-kernel rseq fields copy for validation of
+ * read-only fields.
+ */
+ if (get_user(rseq_kernel_fields(current)->cpu_id_start, &rseq->cpu_id_start) ||
+ get_user(rseq_kernel_fields(current)->cpu_id, &rseq->cpu_id) ||
+ get_user(rseq_kernel_fields(current)->node_id, &rseq->node_id) ||
+ get_user(rseq_kernel_fields(current)->mm_cid, &rseq->mm_cid))
+ return -EFAULT;
+#endif
/*
* If rseq was previously inactive, and has just been
* registered, ensure the cpu_id_start and cpu_id fields
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-11 19:22 Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-11-12 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2024-11-12 14:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-11-12 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241112100419.GN22801@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=carlos@redhat.com \
--cc=dj@redhat.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=posk@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®