From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org,
Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>,
Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] add _statically_true() to simplify GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK()
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 04:08:38 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241112190840.601378-4-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
The first patch introduces a new variant of statically_true() named
_statically_true() which rely on __is_constexpr() to produce a
constant expression result which can be used in BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO()
and other macros which expect a constant expression as input.
The second patch applies this newly created _statically_true() to
GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK().
** Changelog **
v3 -> v3 RESEND:
- send email using the smtp.wanadoo.fr gateway. Note that this may
appear as smtp.orange.fr which is an alias (both have the same IP).
v2 -> v3:
- split the single patch into a series of two patches.
- add explanation of why _statically_true() is needed in addition
to the existing statically_true(). Explain the pros and cons of
each.
- use __builtin_choose_expr() in _statically_true(). The
_statically_true() of the v2 works perfectly fine when used in
conjunction with BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO() but fails if used, for
example, in arrays or in static_assert().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241111164743.339117-2-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr/
v1 -> v2:
- introduce _statically_true(), taking inspiration from
statically_true() as introduced in commit 22f546873149 ("minmax:
improve macro expansion and type checking").
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240609073513.256179-1-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr/
Vincent Mailhol (2):
compiler.h: add _static_assert()
linux/bits.h: simplify GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK()
include/linux/bits.h | 5 ++---
include/linux/compiler.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.45.2
next reply other threads:[~2024-11-12 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-12 19:08 Vincent Mailhol [this message]
2024-11-12 19:08 ` [RESEND PATCH v3 1/2] compiler.h: add _static_assert() Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-12 20:03 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2024-11-13 17:47 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-12 20:26 ` Yury Norov
2024-11-13 17:44 ` Vincent Mailhol
2024-11-12 19:08 ` [RESEND PATCH v3 2/2] linux/bits.h: simplify GENMASK_INPUT_CHECK() Vincent Mailhol
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241112190840.601378-4-mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--to=mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
--cc=rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®