From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
Bird@google.com, Tim <Tim.Bird@sony.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/5] PM: sleep: Add helper functions to loop through superior/subordinate devs
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 14:09:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241114220921.2529905-4-saravanak@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241114220921.2529905-1-saravanak@google.com>
We have a lot of code that does or will loop through superior/subordinate
devices and take action on them. Refactor the code to pull out the common
"loop through" functionality into helper functions to avoid repeating the
logic.
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
---
drivers/base/power/main.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/main.c b/drivers/base/power/main.c
index 9b9b6088e56a..aa1470ef6ac0 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -247,15 +247,22 @@ static int dpm_wait_fn(struct device *dev, void *async_ptr)
return 0;
}
-static void dpm_wait_for_children(struct device *dev, bool async)
-{
- device_for_each_child(dev, &async, dpm_wait_fn);
-}
-
-static void dpm_wait_for_suppliers(struct device *dev, bool async)
+static int dpm_for_each_superior(struct device *dev, void *data,
+ int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data))
{
+ struct device *parent;
+ int ret = 0, idx;
struct device_link *link;
- int idx;
+
+ if (!dev)
+ return 0;
+
+ parent = get_device(dev->parent);
+ if (parent)
+ ret = fn(parent, data);
+ put_device(parent);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
idx = device_links_read_lock();
@@ -267,29 +274,20 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_suppliers(struct device *dev, bool async)
* walking.
*/
list_for_each_entry_rcu_locked(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node)
- if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
- dpm_wait(link->supplier, async);
+ if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT) {
+ ret = fn(link->supplier, data);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
device_links_read_unlock(idx);
+
+ return ret;
}
static bool dpm_wait_for_superior(struct device *dev, bool async)
{
- struct device *parent;
-
- /*
- * If the device is resumed asynchronously and the parent's callback
- * deletes both the device and the parent itself, the parent object may
- * be freed while this function is running, so avoid that by reference
- * counting the parent once more unless the device has been deleted
- * already (in which case return right away).
- */
- parent = get_device(dev->parent);
- if (device_pm_initialized(dev))
- dpm_wait(parent, async);
- put_device(parent);
-
- dpm_wait_for_suppliers(dev, async);
+ dpm_for_each_superior(dev, &async, dpm_wait_fn);
/*
* If the parent's callback has deleted the device, attempting to resume
@@ -298,10 +296,18 @@ static bool dpm_wait_for_superior(struct device *dev, bool async)
return device_pm_initialized(dev);
}
-static void dpm_wait_for_consumers(struct device *dev, bool async)
+static int dpm_for_each_subordinate(struct device *dev, void *data,
+ int (*fn)(struct device *dev, void *data))
{
+ int ret, idx;
struct device_link *link;
- int idx;
+
+ if (!dev)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = device_for_each_child(dev, data, fn);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
idx = device_links_read_lock();
@@ -315,16 +321,20 @@ static void dpm_wait_for_consumers(struct device *dev, bool async)
* unregistration).
*/
list_for_each_entry_rcu_locked(link, &dev->links.consumers, s_node)
- if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT)
- dpm_wait(link->consumer, async);
+ if (READ_ONCE(link->status) != DL_STATE_DORMANT) {
+ ret = fn(link->consumer, data);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
device_links_read_unlock(idx);
+
+ return ret;
}
static void dpm_wait_for_subordinate(struct device *dev, bool async)
{
- dpm_wait_for_children(dev, async);
- dpm_wait_for_consumers(dev, async);
+ dpm_for_each_subordinate(dev, &async, dpm_wait_fn);
}
/**
--
2.47.0.338.g60cca15819-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-14 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-14 22:09 [PATCH v1 0/5] Optimize async device suspend/resume Saravana Kannan
2024-11-14 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/5] PM: sleep: Fix runtime PM issue in dpm_resume() Saravana Kannan
2024-11-16 7:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2024-11-16 21:06 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-12-04 12:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-11 10:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-13 1:49 ` Saravana Kannan
2025-03-13 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-14 20:47 ` Pavel Machek
2025-03-14 20:49 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-14 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/5] PM: sleep: Remove unnecessary mutex lock when waiting on parent Saravana Kannan
2024-12-02 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-02 20:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-02 20:46 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-12-02 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-12-02 23:27 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-12-04 12:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-11-14 22:09 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2024-11-14 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 4/5] PM: sleep: Do breadth first suspend/resume for async suspend/resume Saravana Kannan
2025-03-11 11:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-14 22:09 ` [PATCH v1 5/5] PM: sleep: Spread out async kworker threads during dpm_resume*() phases Saravana Kannan
2024-11-15 5:25 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-15 9:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-11-15 15:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-11-15 16:12 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-11-15 18:33 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-17 0:34 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-17 1:17 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-17 13:34 ` kernel test robot
2024-11-18 9:52 ` Christian Loehle
2024-11-18 17:18 ` Saravana Kannan
2024-11-19 4:04 ` [PATCH v1 0/5] Optimize async device suspend/resume Saravana Kannan
2024-11-19 9:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241114220921.2529905-4-saravanak@google.com \
--to=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=Bird@google.com \
--cc=Tim.Bird@sony.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®