From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0558C629 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731802406; cv=none; b=FAZm3kmXhab/nVMwqYUxgfyeZv9oYw3WcJsXQiSZKObGTxZNcmRfrJMp2WRNxdm6g6SFjCWOYvSydvY6eR6n35NASMCa5H0zHTstovg5W7jDcys6fr4XtJgZf6Bgroq0wtmUlgKL9mKJcdBvykOM3oDj1NhEVsfpo7zMLU7ffZw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731802406; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QaDqJE1KqnRAzh9ujtSliP8VY0c2tSGZYyyu+1pMXgM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YATZu0oGSUaNk/GiAlzK3JVtbUto7av3xp85olrCsNb71iWTbUrD4kQBJMAdday4uO1I+QT6zVZg6lDUZ8X57jNJlnqgc8iSniPfp8gD2B6JbSFzLAx7mJRiDIC9owY1EJCnU+nhXZGSYeHSWh26hxj75zlSx6gI6sayxoxwBMU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=b2Le3tgP; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="b2Le3tgP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1731802405; x=1763338405; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=QaDqJE1KqnRAzh9ujtSliP8VY0c2tSGZYyyu+1pMXgM=; b=b2Le3tgP1oYo+Aq7RAXKmNFLY/1jJ91bwy0YjsuV+KXiMX9oSzhhm7jY Vtz8w0M8+8LJj84K0kcLoWdbUTSiB752d80fdDWT1xJdG/+ZTkmSp7Ag8 qg0KibqAm8vdvSRBtkLtxW75Sk1nl8OE2NvT6OfRod+l0A2yq69QSFD76 v5xCJdD8pBKJ6yBe3PUIz14ZSW3fdBYHVmT9R1eEtQA1jVfjF0t6bQysF vaXhKX+hSnLNL6bMrLrZvsXMWTE1QBa03/4h06W78WHtKetKFAWTijauL UhHewpk2pL0K8QU0C/0aN9S6f/B27lgYJUx8m/phnLSPwVnrmiJ6b0DDG g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qgZZQzJZSOeLPiwpyqsYAQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 5aZxs5qORqq66tuCgEM7Tg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11258"; a="32027619" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,160,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="32027619" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by fmvoesa108.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Nov 2024 16:13:25 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: q5L/tajgQaGgG+3uVPn/Kg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7WPYFC/bTE6fp0Tr+phwzg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,160,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="89290244" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 1e3cc1889ffb) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2024 16:13:22 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 1e3cc1889ffb with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tCSum-0001BJ-0a; Sun, 17 Nov 2024 00:13:20 +0000 Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 08:12:47 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Paul Benoit , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Paul Benoit , Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name Message-ID: <202411170820.t1xuMJVL-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241114030452.10149-1-paul@os.amperecomputing.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241114030452.10149-1-paul@os.amperecomputing.com> Hi Paul, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on soc/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.12-rc7 next-20241115] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Paul-Benoit/firmware-smccc-Support-optional-Arm-SMC-SOC_ID-name/20241114-113039 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/soc/soc.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241114030452.10149-1-paul%40os.amperecomputing.com patch subject: [PATCH] firmware: smccc: Support optional Arm SMC SOC_ID name config: arm-randconfig-002-20241117 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241117/202411170820.t1xuMJVL-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 592c0fe55f6d9a811028b5f3507be91458ab2713) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241117/202411170820.t1xuMJVL-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411170820.t1xuMJVL-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:26:28: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs' 26 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs regs_1_2; | ^ drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:26:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs' 26 | struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs regs_1_2; | ^ >> drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c:50:4: error: call to undeclared function 'arm_smccc_1_2_smc'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 50 | arm_smccc_1_2_smc( | ^ 2 errors generated. vim +26 drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c 22 23 void __init arm_smccc_version_init(u32 version, enum arm_smccc_conduit conduit) 24 { 25 struct arm_smccc_res res; > 26 struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs regs_1_2; 27 28 smccc_version = version; 29 smccc_conduit = conduit; 30 31 smccc_trng_available = smccc_probe_trng(); 32 33 if ((smccc_version >= ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_2) && 34 (smccc_conduit != SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE)) { 35 arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID, 36 ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID, &res); 37 if ((s32)res.a0 >= 0) { 38 arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID, 0, &res); 39 smccc_soc_id_version = (s32)res.a0; 40 arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID, 1, &res); 41 smccc_soc_id_revision = (s32)res.a0; 42 43 /* Issue Number 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling Convention 44 * specification introduces an optional "name" string 45 * to the ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID function. Fetch it if 46 * available. 47 */ 48 regs_1_2.a0 = ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_SOC_ID; 49 regs_1_2.a1 = 2; /* SOC_ID name */ > 50 arm_smccc_1_2_smc( 51 (const struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *)®s_1_2, 52 (struct arm_smccc_1_2_regs *)®s_1_2); 53 54 if ((u32)regs_1_2.a0 == 0) { 55 unsigned long *destination = 56 (unsigned long *)smccc_soc_id_name; 57 58 /* 59 * Copy regs_1_2.a1..regs_1_2.a17 to the 60 * smccc_soc_id_name string with consideration 61 * to the endianness of the values in a1..a17. 62 * As per Issue 1.6 of the Arm SMC Calling 63 * Convention, the string will be NUL terminated 64 * and padded, from the end of the string to 65 * the end of the 136 byte buffer, with NULs. 66 */ 67 *destination++ = 68 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a1); 69 *destination++ = 70 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a2); 71 *destination++ = 72 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a3); 73 *destination++ = 74 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a4); 75 *destination++ = 76 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a5); 77 *destination++ = 78 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a6); 79 *destination++ = 80 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a7); 81 *destination++ = 82 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a8); 83 *destination++ = 84 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a9); 85 *destination++ = 86 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a10); 87 *destination++ = 88 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a11); 89 *destination++ = 90 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a12); 91 *destination++ = 92 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a13); 93 *destination++ = 94 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a14); 95 *destination++ = 96 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a15); 97 *destination++ = 98 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a16); 99 *destination++ = 100 cpu_to_le64p((const __u64 *)®s_1_2.a17); 101 } 102 } 103 } 104 } 105 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki