From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCEC619007E for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732525409; cv=none; b=G/OMLqonUtt3cFSlGp1j3F3rhvi6Fybis0m1CALpz+o1nloOL4elQEEIsBTZFKsXIkRW7XLmf9nGTUyBSPQuF9kZi27X97UPSVeP9unXXjqZRAulTvVbJKhUjDMxXVVGAePqWeph4ntevjtjg0mGXq30S/22IC3HxPnm0T3pn8w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732525409; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2OmXam+k7g5h8EQzhTSDSS4SU0GY+CkNe50RDJMNa2w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cLawoxEPMZqg31qRiLQ3yO8aJPt2vqMvwLA4heBxyXzkgqJFOUlGTS/MSZlJ3RNLuxF8ceSAEUVrGDtDJLVY0Qbt1B/m1z57zJp6BS12zbXVmuljzmQAsX4twnM+JzOYbSA1s0JH4i2cH0b6AOsGbBrsCbjzBZyOTwv8zeJhgGE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nyDHFgMI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nyDHFgMI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1732525407; x=1764061407; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=2OmXam+k7g5h8EQzhTSDSS4SU0GY+CkNe50RDJMNa2w=; b=nyDHFgMIVJOHO2bLxHQC7ZRdFtrNpDX3BFbgCuVjPk30UvoL2PZ8ENxm LvbYceji4k0w6A3oIfBJ0Jf+tmvhitt+E9Zm1Q9wPXzpMxR2TFRSp3UDl lQjy5rhqX/rqJE9eGjbEaE4kn5IeTo5vTuzSrqWsS1avsZNsUAKD7pm2f Lr7EWrijOwJfRnPE2fVLbBMcFhCo5QUnu2YT80wz3zpDivO1FXypS++G3 aGciqQQ8JlkrLlZc4MwMLbCxFDVG4CPsLm+98aHh+37IQdxSrMc59WkIj o7DSyde0RSiiM1NneGuoZZYGbfm8QIB1niCxIPeEA4ygvl/ilE0JNpKC8 g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gqbnLsYmRcGfXvlX/wTzMg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HbzlYNG0SMicoWhYrvUXeg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11266"; a="43119537" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,182,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="43119537" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Nov 2024 01:03:26 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: BUccMeWbS5ydhmKTy5oDuA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: CGuwAQ6IToSSwdzYuYJTsA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,182,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="95988831" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 8122d2fc1967) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Nov 2024 01:03:24 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 8122d2fc1967 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tFV05-00066H-2h; Mon, 25 Nov 2024 09:03:21 +0000 Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:02:22 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Mateusz Guzik , tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de, andy@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Mateusz Guzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] string: retire bcmp() Message-ID: <202411251629.TKfhELVt-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241123094729.1099378-3-mjguzik@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241123094729.1099378-3-mjguzik@gmail.com> Hi Mateusz, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on kees/for-next/hardening] [also build test ERROR on tip/master tip/x86/core linus/master v6.12 next-20241125] [cannot apply to tip/auto-latest] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Mateusz-Guzik/x86-callthunks-s-bcmp-memcmp/20241125-110959 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git for-next/hardening patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241123094729.1099378-3-mjguzik%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] string: retire bcmp() config: arm-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241125/202411251629.TKfhELVt-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 20.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 592c0fe55f6d9a811028b5f3507be91458ab2713) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241125/202411251629.TKfhELVt-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202411251629.TKfhELVt-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: bcmp >>> referenced by do_mounts.c >>> init/do_mounts.o:(parse_root_device) in archive vmlinux.a >>> referenced by do_mounts.c >>> init/do_mounts.o:(parse_root_device) in archive vmlinux.a >>> referenced by do_mounts.c >>> init/do_mounts.o:(parse_root_device) in archive vmlinux.a >>> referenced 37 more times -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki