mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Cc: "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"kys@microsoft.com" <kys@microsoft.com>,
	"haiyangz@microsoft.com" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	"wei.liu@kernel.org" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
	"decui@microsoft.com" <decui@microsoft.com>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/hyperv: Set X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE unconditionally
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:24:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241125222457.GA28630@skinsburskii.> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN6PR02MB4157121B6CD9F5CAAFB39637D4232@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 06:33:12PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> From: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2024 4:51 PM
> > 
> > On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 07:48:06PM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
> > > From: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com> Sent: Tuesday,
> > November 12, 2024 10:18 AM
> > > >
> > > > Enable X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE by default as X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE is
> > > > independent from invariant TSC and should have never been gated by the
> > > > HV_ACCESS_TSC_INVARIANT privilege.
> > >
> > > I think originally X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE was gated by the Hyper-V
> > > TSC Invariant feature because otherwise VM live migration may cause
> > > the TSC value reported by the RDTSC/RDTSCP instruction in the guest
> > > to abruptly change frequency and value. In such cases, the TSC isn't
> > > useable by the kernel or user space.
> > >
> > > Enabling the Hyper-V TSC Invariant feature fixes that by using the
> > > hardware scaling available in more recent processors to automatically
> > > fixup the TSC value returned by RDTSC/RDTSCP in the guest.
> > >
> > > Is there a practical problem that is fixed by always enabling
> > > X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE?
> > >
> > 
> > The particular problem is that HV_ACCESS_TSC_INVARIANT is not set for the
> > nested root, which in turn leads to keeping tsc clocksource watchdog
> > thread and TSC sycn check timer around.
> 
> I have trouble keeping all the different TSC "features" conceptually
> separate. :-( The TSC frequency not changing (and the value not
> abruptly jumping?) should already be represented by
> X86_FEATURE_TSC_CONSTANT.  In the kernel, X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE
> effectively only controls whether the TSC clocksource watchdog is
> enabled, and in spite of the live migration foibles, I don't see a need
> for that watchdog in a Hyper-V VM. So maybe it's OK to always set
> X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE in a Hyper-V VM, as you have
> proposed.
> 
> The "tsc_reliable" flag is also exposed to user space as part of the
> /proc/cpuinfo "flags" output, so theoretically some user space
> program could change behavior based on that flag. But that seems
> a bit far-fetched. I know there are user space programs that check
> the CPUID INVARIANT_TSC flag to know whether they can use
> the raw RDTSC instruction output to do start/stop timing. The
> Hyper-V TSC Invariant feature makes that work correctly, even
> across live migrations.
> 

It sounds to me that if X86_FEATURE_TSC_CONSTANT is available on Hyper-V, then we
can set X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE.
Is it what you are saying?

Stanislav

> Michael
> 
> > 
> > But the live migration concern you raised is indeed still out there.
> > 
> > Thank you for the input Michael, I'll think more about it.
> > 
> > Stanislav
> > 
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > >
> > > > To elaborate, the HV_ACCESS_TSC_INVARIANT privilege allows certain types of
> > > > guests to opt-in to invariant TSC by writing the
> > > > HV_X64_MSR_TSC_INVARIANT_CONTROL register. Not all guests will have this
> > > > privilege and the hypervisor will automatically opt-in certain types of
> > > > guests (e.g. EXO partitions) to invariant TSC, but this functionality is
> > > > unrelated to the TSC reliability.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsburskii <skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c |    6 +++---
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > index d18078834ded..14412afcc398 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c
> > > > @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
> > > >  	machine_ops.crash_shutdown = hv_machine_crash_shutdown;
> > > >  #endif
> > > >  #endif
> > > > -	if (ms_hyperv.features & HV_ACCESS_TSC_INVARIANT) {
> > > > +	if (ms_hyperv.features & HV_ACCESS_TSC_INVARIANT)
> > > >  		/*
> > > >  		 * Writing to synthetic MSR 0x40000118 updates/changes the
> > > >  		 * guest visible CPUIDs. Setting bit 0 of this MSR  enables
> > > > @@ -526,8 +526,8 @@ static void __init ms_hyperv_init_platform(void)
> > > >  		 * is called.
> > > >  		 */
> > > >  		wrmsrl(HV_X64_MSR_TSC_INVARIANT_CONTROL,
> > HV_EXPOSE_INVARIANT_TSC);
> > > > -		setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE);
> > > > -	}
> > > > +
> > > > +	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_RELIABLE);
> > > >
> > > >  	/*
> > > >  	 * Generation 2 instances don't support reading the NMI status from
> > > >
> > > >
> > >

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-25 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-12 18:18 Stanislav Kinsburskii
2024-11-12 19:48 ` Michael Kelley
2024-11-20  0:51   ` Stanislav Kinsburskii
2024-11-22 18:33     ` Michael Kelley
2024-11-25 22:24       ` Stanislav Kinsburskii [this message]
2024-11-26  6:11         ` Michael Kelley
2024-12-11 18:00           ` Stanislav Kinsburskii
2024-12-11 22:22             ` Michael Kelley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241125222457.GA28630@skinsburskii. \
    --to=skinsburskii@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=decui@microsoft.com \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®