From: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to RCU callback
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:07:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241202140735.56368-3-gmonaco@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241202140735.56368-1-gmonaco@redhat.com>
Currently, the task_mm_cid_work function is called in a task work
triggered by a scheduler tick. This can delay the execution of the
task for the entire duration of the function.
This patch runs the task_mm_cid_work in the RCU callback thread rather
than in the task context before returning to userspace.
The main advantage of this change is that the function can be offloaded
to a different CPU and even preempted by RT tasks.
On a busy system, this may mean the function gets called less often, but
the current behaviour already doesn't provide guarantees.
Signed-off-by: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 1 -
kernel/sched/core.c | 17 ++++++-----------
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index d380bffee2ef..5d141c310917 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1374,7 +1374,6 @@ struct task_struct {
int last_mm_cid; /* Most recent cid in mm */
int migrate_from_cpu;
int mm_cid_active; /* Whether cid bitmap is active */
- struct callback_head cid_work;
#endif
struct tlbflush_unmap_batch tlb_ubc;
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 57b50b5952fa..0fc1a972fd4f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -10520,17 +10520,15 @@ static void sched_mm_cid_remote_clear_weight(struct mm_struct *mm, int cpu,
sched_mm_cid_remote_clear(mm, pcpu_cid, cpu);
}
-static void task_mm_cid_work(struct callback_head *work)
+static void task_mm_cid_work(struct rcu_head *rhp)
{
unsigned long now = jiffies, old_scan, next_scan;
- struct task_struct *t = current;
+ struct task_struct *t = container_of(rhp, struct task_struct, rcu);
struct cpumask *cidmask;
struct mm_struct *mm;
int weight, cpu;
- SCHED_WARN_ON(t != container_of(work, struct task_struct, cid_work));
-
- work->next = work; /* Prevent double-add */
+ rhp->next = rhp; /* Prevent double-add */
if (t->flags & PF_EXITING)
return;
mm = t->mm;
@@ -10574,23 +10572,20 @@ void init_sched_mm_cid(struct task_struct *t)
if (mm_users == 1)
mm->mm_cid_next_scan = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MM_CID_SCAN_DELAY);
}
- t->cid_work.next = &t->cid_work; /* Protect against double add */
- init_task_work(&t->cid_work, task_mm_cid_work);
}
void task_tick_mm_cid(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr)
{
- struct callback_head *work = &curr->cid_work;
+ struct rcu_head *rhp = &curr->rcu;
unsigned long now = jiffies;
if (!curr->mm || (curr->flags & (PF_EXITING | PF_KTHREAD)) ||
- work->next != work)
+ rhp->next != rhp)
return;
if (time_before(now, READ_ONCE(curr->mm->mm_cid_next_scan)))
return;
- /* No page allocation under rq lock */
- task_work_add(curr, work, TWA_RESUME | TWAF_NO_ALLOC);
+ call_rcu(rhp, task_mm_cid_work);
}
void sched_mm_cid_exit_signals(struct task_struct *t)
--
2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-02 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-02 14:07 [PATCH 0/2] sched: improve task_mm_cid_work impact on isolated systems Gabriele Monaco
2024-12-02 14:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched: Optimise task_mm_cid_work duration Gabriele Monaco
2024-12-02 14:21 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-12-02 14:56 ` Gabriele Monaco
2024-12-02 15:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-12-02 15:59 ` Gabriele Monaco
2024-12-03 2:14 ` kernel test robot
2024-12-02 14:07 ` Gabriele Monaco [this message]
2024-12-02 14:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Move task_mm_cid_work to RCU callback Mathieu Desnoyers
2024-12-02 15:21 ` Gabriele Monaco
2024-12-03 15:00 ` Joel Fernandes
2024-12-04 8:01 ` Gabriele Monaco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241202140735.56368-3-gmonaco@redhat.com \
--to=gmonaco@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®