From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22541EF0AC for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 16:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733243653; cv=none; b=kAh9oZZ5MpC+F/xLu42xxAuo6kdeLPj1ghWSg88iPy+yCgrGiiSYhYMw6U96uiikLt281SoepO9nB791MLLvDe9I+4+0k8mfjDs8rH9lyHZh+hvy+EUlUVsWnkg5jmYfXoFDALdcCcLVW0eOCAc3A3lvccxeP7b0BVsvztVfdDk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733243653; c=relaxed/simple; bh=myVDv30I2SCONJYjABsPOWsgsgA2VSl9rzh6uno/CuM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=an2Wt6/PErflCTheLauP6s8oKsBGZbN7oahppFa3h0smftKqTL2K2Eq/ttCQZffJzxrY8cg+zIzH9189Df66zWaHGDvIHJPIf3l+YJO4KjBWsWmi2iYGIKRBS/SqX3MhAwRhmqBG1FcUEHri4V3Wvkv6k/R/yKaTy5u7fQPO5FE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=O5exyY0p; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="O5exyY0p" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1733243650; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=5mYdcOoxeqZZGRp6kvkCtVM0EbJxxztYUGd4BIrXpSc=; b=O5exyY0p54q8fLNTyYcpMoCJhCqRYDO/v/uEIYX/lWNTwlYp7MCa1+tQiUgu57O7ESo0ai V+u1Jz5BPlZW98TDbPZ/B9hSqbM2k+/pF1r42qkXraKEcCywslxiHZu49XPZZgDkhP9tkg pN6DHEGxNZqhb7q+CIQ3nghMto353dg= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-561-Jk__6YEwMoOD-Q4DlTyP-Q-1; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 11:34:05 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Jk__6YEwMoOD-Q4DlTyP-Q-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: Jk__6YEwMoOD-Q4DlTyP-Q Received: from mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A7A1958B0D; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 16:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.136]) by mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F161956054; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 16:34:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez To: quic_yuzha@quicinc.com Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, jjohnson@kernel.org, jtornosm@redhat.com, kvalo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, quic_cjhuang@quicinc.com, vbenes@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: allow APs combination when dual stations are supported Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 17:33:59 +0100 Message-ID: <20241203163359.129185-1-jtornosm@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <99359cc4-2279-4a8a-80a1-d5475fd5208d@quicinc.com> References: <99359cc4-2279-4a8a-80a1-d5475fd5208d@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 > And you want setup sta + sap + sap, right? Your proposed interface combination fails as well for me if I am just setting 2APs. > When up the second sap will meet error? Could you pls share the error > logs? This is the log that is appearing: [ 61.909165] 8021q: 802.1Q VLAN Support v1.8 [ 62.227530] ath11k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to create vdev 3, reached max vdev limit 3 It is appearing after configuring both APs when only one AP is up and when both are down (see my previous 'iw dev' outputs). > I'm not very sure if you add all interface with managed type, and do > "ifconfig xxx up" before running hostapd. Yes, I am setting the link up before running hostapd. >You can try add second and third interface with > "iw dev xx interface add xx type __ap". And yes, I am doing like that for both APs. Please, take into account that everything is working with the old interface configuration and when it is set with the parameter (no error log), but it is not working for me with your interface combination. Have you tried with 2.4GHz band? Thanks Best regards Jose Ignacio