mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] smp: Evaluate local cond_func() before IPI side-effects
Date: Tue,  3 Dec 2024 11:35:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241203163558.3455535-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (raw)

In smp_call_function_many_cond(), the local cond_func() is evaluated
after triggering the remote CPU IPIs.

If cond_func() depends on loading shared state updated by other CPU's
IPI handlers func(), then triggering execution of remote CPUs IPI before
evaluating cond_func() may have unexpected consequences.

One example scenario is evaluating a jiffies delay in cond_func(), which
is updated by func() in the IPI handlers. This situation can prevent
execution of periodic cleanup code on the local CPU.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20241202202213.26a79ed6@fangorn/
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
---
 kernel/smp.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
index 27dc31a146a3..f104c8e83fc4 100644
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -815,7 +815,8 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task());
 
 	/* Check if we need local execution. */
-	if ((scf_flags & SCF_RUN_LOCAL) && cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
+	if ((scf_flags & SCF_RUN_LOCAL) && cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask) &&
+	    (!cond_func || cond_func(this_cpu, info)))
 		run_local = true;
 
 	/* Check if we need remote execution, i.e., any CPU excluding this one. */
@@ -868,7 +869,7 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(const struct cpumask *mask,
 			send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
 	}
 
-	if (run_local && (!cond_func || cond_func(this_cpu, info))) {
+	if (run_local) {
 		unsigned long flags;
 
 		local_irq_save(flags);
-- 
2.39.5


             reply	other threads:[~2024-12-03 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-03 16:35 Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2024-12-03 17:21 ` Rik van Riel
2024-12-05 14:42 ` [tip: locking/core] smp/scf: " tip-bot2 for Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241203163558.3455535-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®