From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56FF1741D2; Fri, 6 Dec 2024 02:29:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733452177; cv=none; b=PqW8gyjvmwAtm3Zs712RZuAdK3cRdmMIABaoxU5Oqn07B5Ea68qb4h/NTodBD/m05r7yIICANu3z0lmVXmeKJnjxCNbM1JuceZnb0lcJcYLeek4MnjntDZ2fa17JXyLSjbrg39Jv1WFmKWciAMRPR24+33aqMusnaTgoB/XZ85c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733452177; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UWYkmQgJqsODlM0e3u/6lpT+QT8jC6RKy54hcLbglIU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tDtgZOEWvLnMbmIjlAh11/kkBXRMzjvP4KDjVfI8wBDswav+pVmhnhm+70aHLPLvP+3IR4ptdY5tiE43eoswAhOxhgvoVNapM0SaQuDQnZjUkk8RuWSryi79JqrCXxSzYCDElRFXeVXFdiIXt++ktmuqxWZmLpj9lmlFCOq3EzY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=HmdrrhjA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="HmdrrhjA" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1733452176; x=1764988176; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=UWYkmQgJqsODlM0e3u/6lpT+QT8jC6RKy54hcLbglIU=; b=HmdrrhjAd1tYBPNKhYBStFC2Ek5Ra/3vkg6oMbUgOSGkdBNqX06OepQg 4b/OJcw2n00fKOv37oCydkwCn6TU4FUsFlD2iK2SpfCuSRYCtBHARcQiJ eu560MvoL31SGrcIr0Fz4Is1I1NR7z4x3XZsw3UqtsbzrtltxaiyD1tzI u1mr50UjMkTEKhJvm7wb8xnMDWhuUaEnU+gmaTXrQPtIpHTPBY/G0Fv8K QC2IveNezNnTpDjvIBrXjrym4kWHMaMMY53vmo+sPnCbU83kzPl9fKXh+ oks/V4V68xySlC4yanHhf3Wk97b4pRjNuWYSk/EkCIHWLf39+Ff3Q35mx A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: L3Tvmo5kRw+e4bfgRL1CNw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Zvub0rilT2i0kMPml5W4KQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11277"; a="33943020" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,212,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="33943020" Received: from fmviesa009.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.149]) by orvoesa110.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2024 18:29:35 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: lwXnpxdgQ6yYKcNCD6eNMA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: znHyy5KWTeu/Yt7uR8mtgA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,212,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="94749549" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 82a3f569d0cb) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa009.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2024 18:29:32 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 82a3f569d0cb with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tJO5x-0000cl-24; Fri, 06 Dec 2024 02:29:29 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 10:28:44 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Igor Belwon , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Chanwoo Choi , Alim Akhtar , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Conor Dooley Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] clk: samsung: Introduce Exynos990 clock controller driver Message-ID: <202412061048.3gu75pLi-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241205193423.783815-4-igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241205193423.783815-4-igor.belwon@mentallysanemainliners.org> Hi Igor, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on krzk/for-next] [also build test ERROR on krzk-dt/for-next clk/clk-next linus/master v6.13-rc1 next-20241205] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Igor-Belwon/clk-samsung-clk-pll-Add-support-for-pll_-0717x-0718x-0732x/20241206-043559 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241205193423.783815-4-igor.belwon%40mentallysanemainliners.org patch subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] clk: samsung: Introduce Exynos990 clock controller driver config: arc-randconfig-001-20241206 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241206/202412061048.3gu75pLi-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241206/202412061048.3gu75pLi-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412061048.3gu75pLi-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c:13:10: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/exynos990.h: No such file or directory 13 | #include | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ compilation terminated. vim +13 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos990.c 12 > 13 #include 14 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki