From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 369B222C6C5 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2024 12:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733660014; cv=none; b=oMGu/B2PjadZr3zIJRb5BROD5ATydLAuqTIiKIt9u0CxoY8G9xwWggoHWxy+xDWwImISZLvCYQ9OjqE9XN52B3kRFYT6exIbHZSdHq4j8v+qCwruvnRULRk0gZutcyEH9QWIMdz4larOvKM6OPJiJxe/AdMninQq93fsREMYu1E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733660014; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9k55SSvilJwIU2K6+1S00Q1l/GJx19QY0LEzQMQV8wY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=cIEzdjphXPgWLnKv/CUVWQrJTz4gAuAEV0uujLg0siH98YagU/2zHbXGouU18BNBxrzKUvSTQ+jz8bnQSZqVOmsgBCf2IXQ+P7zcv6XpMcEsjkIfPC3n7uCXj8TrdGSY51yjbQkgTxoqi9ABizdlVWDiNfp71adNkFobyUSV1DA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=T6ZXlYea; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="T6ZXlYea" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1733660012; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9k55SSvilJwIU2K6+1S00Q1l/GJx19QY0LEzQMQV8wY=; b=T6ZXlYea99CTNHNNgEoS/hy2INr0RaXx+XIKcKeRVL/M1F/oK89MbFrqUdnSmTPQm0zAUG aRCamIukMt3PHD2txdnjl6o1oLZWqgc/U1iDOUQoVcR+gvYyheqbcGE/xYERRlvLGTIcqk 09c0qNCPtY63W3hM1iQqMkaw8Qqfm70= Received: from mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-530-KL5y-vUDPw6ByRwbPHd4WA-1; Sun, 08 Dec 2024 07:13:28 -0500 X-MC-Unique: KL5y-vUDPw6ByRwbPHd4WA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: KL5y-vUDPw6ByRwbPHd4WA Received: from mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EBA919560AB; Sun, 8 Dec 2024 12:13:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.61]) by mx-prod-int-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED13E1956095; Sun, 8 Dec 2024 12:13:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez To: quic_yuzha@quicinc.com Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, jjohnson@kernel.org, jtornosm@redhat.com, kvalo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, quic_cjhuang@quicinc.com, vbenes@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: allow APs combination when dual stations are supported Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 13:13:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20241208121321.9760-1-jtornosm@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <0f24e115-e76d-4c8a-8a1b-591a157ee78e@quicinc.com> References: <0f24e115-e76d-4c8a-8a1b-591a157ee78e@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.15 >My point is that you can try setup with ap type interface, This is what I am doing! > now combination limits not allow up 3 inferfaces with managed interface. Why? The limits were bigger previously. Why cannot allow the old configuration (previous to the commit f019f4dff2e4 ("wifi: ath11k: support 2 station interfaces"a))? In another way, your proposed configuration is limited for me. Thanks Best regards Jose Ignacio