From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4065B1ADC60 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 10:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736850396; cv=none; b=buiqTiC4P2kyu5BAudcNtwhULAuJSZyK7jJqOUlbFP/zhHQkiflQwJkfDJI9umMaApCT2zqsLXQwbul6SpmJrsWRaVurmrpNMpm8nwaF+8O3AC1syok2L9vsYIM5AcLOOn8XZsVYee1biFZJYYSabFDoUCUAltNTdYfJkdyz++0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736850396; c=relaxed/simple; bh=C/kUkHi7OZ7FFQV4m/urbnROenOvXwyJuTim9Wecb/Q=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=orLvnsy5tH0VVh2OP40VFELfY+JXNWYepGtMwZwEJ6xPB+DOwM5GpsrMzQjcRpiGk1gQrwvqjjwAlEutfDjzIMYzjL1o5uUCQkxXIjTxYSJoFcJ7mbqDJ6W1fE1/KSQ2UBB1HZoMMPDUEiuMSysNZ4vnoXZcz31fKaSFWV1xT4E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.176.79.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4YXQHM4jwtz6L5Jy; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:25:03 +0800 (CST) Received: from frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.182.85.71]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 446931402C6; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 18:26:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost (10.203.177.66) by frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Tue, 14 Jan 2025 11:26:29 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 11:45:34 +0000 From: Jonathan Cameron To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab CC: "Michael S . Tsirkin" , Shiju Jose , Ani Sinha , Dongjiu Geng , Igor Mammedov , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/16] acpi/ghes: make the GHES record generation more generic Message-ID: <20241209114534.000079a6@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-w64-mingw32) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: lhrpeml500009.china.huawei.com (7.191.174.84) To frapeml500008.china.huawei.com (7.182.85.71) On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 09:54:15 +0100 Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Split the code into separate functions to allow using the > common CPER filling code by different error sources. > > The generic code was moved to ghes_record_cper_errors(), > and ghes_gen_err_data_uncorrectable_recoverable() now contains > only a logic to fill the Generic Error Data part of the record, > as described at: > > ACPI 6.2: 18.3.2.7.1 Generic Error Data > > The remaining code to generate a memory error now belongs to > acpi_ghes_record_errors() function. > > A further patch will give it a better name. > > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Igor tagged this in previous posting. Any reason for dropping? > > # Conflicts: > # roms/edk2 Should clear this out. A few formatting things inline but beyond that looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron > /* > @@ -383,15 +356,18 @@ void acpi_ghes_add_fw_cfg(AcpiGhesState *ags, FWCfgState *s, > ags->present = true; > } > > -int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address) > +void ghes_record_cper_errors(const void *cper, size_t len, > + uint16_t source_id, Error **errp) > { > uint64_t error_block_addr, read_ack_register_addr, read_ack_register = 0; > uint64_t start_addr; > - bool ret = -1; > AcpiGedState *acpi_ged_state; > AcpiGhesState *ags; > > - assert(source_id < ACPI_GHES_ERROR_SOURCE_COUNT); > + if (len > ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH) { > + error_setg(errp, "GHES CPER record is too big: %ld", len); > + return; > + } > > acpi_ged_state = ACPI_GED(object_resolve_path_type("", TYPE_ACPI_GED, > NULL)); > @@ -406,6 +382,10 @@ int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address) > sizeof(error_block_addr)); > > error_block_addr = le64_to_cpu(error_block_addr); > + if (!error_block_addr) { > + error_setg(errp, "can not find Generic Error Status Block"); > + return; > + } > > read_ack_register_addr = start_addr + > ACPI_GHES_ERROR_SOURCE_COUNT * sizeof(uint64_t); > @@ -415,24 +395,63 @@ int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address) > > /* zero means OSPM does not acknowledge the error */ > if (!read_ack_register) { > - error_report("OSPM does not acknowledge previous error," > - " so can not record CPER for current error anymore"); > - } else if (error_block_addr) { > - read_ack_register = cpu_to_le64(0); > - /* > - * Clear the Read Ack Register, OSPM will write it to 1 when > - * it acknowledges this error. > - */ > - cpu_physical_memory_write(read_ack_register_addr, > - &read_ack_register, sizeof(uint64_t)); > - > - ret = acpi_ghes_record_mem_error(error_block_addr, > - physical_address); > - } else { > - error_report("can not find Generic Error Status Block"); > + error_setg(errp, > + "OSPM does not acknowledge previous error," > + " so can not record CPER for current error anymore"); > + return; > } > > - return ret; > + read_ack_register = cpu_to_le64(0); > + /* > + * Clear the Read Ack Register, OSPM will write 1 to this register when > + * it acknowledges the error. > + */ > + cpu_physical_memory_write(read_ack_register_addr, > + &read_ack_register, sizeof(uint64_t)); Maybe rewrap that line now it's indented less? > + > + /* Write the generic error data entry into guest memory */ > + cpu_physical_memory_write(error_block_addr, cper, len); > + > + return; > +} > + > +int acpi_ghes_record_errors(uint16_t source_id, uint64_t physical_address) > +{ > + /* Memory Error Section Type */ > + const uint8_t guid[] = > + UUID_LE(0xA5BC1114, 0x6F64, 0x4EDE, 0xB8, 0x63, 0x3E, 0x83, \ > + 0xED, 0x7C, 0x83, 0xB1); > + Error *errp = NULL; > + int data_length; > + GArray *block; > + > + block = g_array_new(false, true /* clear */, 1); > + > + data_length = ACPI_GHES_DATA_LENGTH + ACPI_GHES_MEM_CPER_LENGTH; > + /* > + * It should not run out of the preallocated memory if adding a new generic > + * error data entry > + */ > + assert((data_length + ACPI_GHES_GESB_SIZE) <= > + ACPI_GHES_MAX_RAW_DATA_LENGTH); > + > + ghes_gen_err_data_uncorrectable_recoverable(block, guid, > + data_length); Trivial: That fits on one line under 80 chars. > + > + /* Build the memory section CPER for above new generic error data entry */ > + acpi_ghes_build_append_mem_cper(block, physical_address); > + > + /* Report the error */ > + ghes_record_cper_errors(block->data, block->len, source_id, &errp); > + > + g_array_free(block, true); > + > + if (errp) { > + error_report_err(errp); > + return -1; > + } > + > + return 0; > }