From: Nikhil Jha <njha@janestreet.com>
To: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@kernel.org>,
Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: propagate fileid changed errors back to syscall
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 12:12:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241210A1712306692debd.njha@janestreet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C71642EC-B9F9-4A7D-AD11-D169268460FE@redhat.com>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 07:11:43AM -0500, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2024, at 12:39, Nikhil Jha wrote:
>
> > Hello! This is the first kernel patch I have tried to upstream. I'm
> > following along with the kernel newbies guide but apologies if I got
> > anything wrong.
> >
> > Currently, if there is a mismatch in the request and response fileids in
> > an NFS request, the kernel logs an error and attempts to return ESTALE.
> > However, this error is currently dropped before it makes it all the way
> > to userspace. This appears to be a mistake, since as far as I can tell
> > that ESTALE value is never consumed from anywhere.
> >
> > Callstack for async NFS write, at time of error:
> >
> > nfs_update_inode <- returns -ESTALE
> > nfs_refresh_inode_locked
> > nfs_writeback_update_inode <- error is dropped here
> > nfs3_write_done
> > nfs_writeback_done
> > nfs_pgio_result <- other errors are collected here
> > rpc_exit_task
> > __rpc_execute
> > rpc_async_schedule
> > process_one_work
> > worker_thread
> > kthread
> > ret_from_fork
> >
> > We ran into this issue ourselves, and seeing the -ESTALE in the kernel
> > source code but not from userspace was surprising.
> >
> > I tested a rebased version of this patch on an el8 kernel (v6.1.114),
> > and it seems to correctly propagate this error.
> >
> >> 8------------------------------------------------------8<
> >
> > If an NFS server returns a response with a different file id to the
> > response, the kernel currently prints out an error and attempts to
> > return -ESTALE. However, this -ESTALE value is never surfaced anywhere.
>
> Hi Nikhil Jha,
>
> Will this cause us to return -ESTALE to the application even if the WRITE
> was successful?
>
> Ben
>
Hi Ben,
Hmm.. I'm not sure how to answer that question exactly. A fileid is only
mismatched between a request RPC and response RPC when something really
weird is going on (i.e. a bug in the NFS server), so it's hard to reason
about if a WRITE was successful or not.
The `return -ESTALE` was already in the kernel code, but this particular
codepath seems to have accidentally dropped that error.
Nikhil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-10 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-09 17:39 Nikhil Jha
2024-12-10 12:11 ` Benjamin Coddington
2024-12-10 17:12 ` Nikhil Jha [this message]
2024-12-10 17:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2024-12-10 17:46 ` Nikhil Jha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241210A1712306692debd.njha@janestreet.com \
--to=njha@janestreet.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trondmy@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®