From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 3/8] rcu: Move rcu_report_exp_rdp() setting of ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp under lock
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:39:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241212183936.1936196-3-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <928b8031-2bfe-4c90-9952-7d331e027ae3@paulmck-laptop>
This commit reduces the state space of rcu_report_exp_rdp() by moving
the setting of ->cpu_no_qs.b.exp under the rcu_node structure's ->lock.
The lock isn't really all that important here, given that this per-CPU
field is supposed to be written only by its CPU, but the disabling of
interrupts excludes things like rcu_exp_handler(), which also can write
to this same field. Avoiding this sort of interleaved access reduces
the state space.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 581e88d39542d..5c4ea66cc00dd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_rdp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
unsigned long flags;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
- WRITE_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp, false);
raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
+ WRITE_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp, false);
rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult(rnp, flags, rdp->grpmask, true);
}
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 18:39 [PATCH rcu 0/8] Miscellaneous fixes for v6.14 Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:39 ` [PATCH rcu 1/8] rcu: Report callbacks enqueued on offline CPU blind spot Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:39 ` [PATCH rcu 2/8] rcu: Make rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult() caller acquire lock Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2024-12-12 18:39 ` [PATCH rcu 4/8] rcu: Replace open-coded rcu_exp_need_qs() from rcu_exp_handler() with call Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:39 ` [PATCH rcu 5/8] rcu: Make preemptible rcu_exp_handler() check idempotency Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:39 ` [PATCH rcu 6/8] rcu: Add KCSAN exclusive-writer assertions for rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:39 ` [PATCH rcu 7/8] rcu: Add lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled() to rcu_exp_need_qs() Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:39 ` [PATCH rcu 8/8] MAINTAINERS: Update RCU git tree Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241212183936.1936196-3-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®