From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 10/18] rcutorture: Pretty-print rcutorture reader segments
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2024 10:49:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241212184957.2127441-10-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62e4d9a4-18ad-49b3-9656-23e17b78033f@paulmck-laptop>
The current "Failure/close-call rcutorture reader segments" output is
good and sufficient, but annoying when you have to interpret several
tens of them after an all-night rcutorture run. This commit therefore
makes them a bit more human-readable.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 81b3743f81dca..c875e7239ae7d 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -3560,25 +3560,39 @@ rcu_torture_cleanup(void)
pr_alert("\t: No segments recorded!!!\n");
firsttime = 1;
for (i = 0; i < rt_read_nsegs; i++) {
- pr_alert("\t%d: %#x ", i, err_segs[i].rt_readstate);
+ pr_alert("\t%d: %#4x", i, err_segs[i].rt_readstate);
if (err_segs[i].rt_delay_jiffies != 0) {
pr_cont("%s%ldjiffies", firsttime ? "" : "+",
err_segs[i].rt_delay_jiffies);
firsttime = 0;
}
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_LOG_CPU))
+ pr_cont(" CPU %-2d", err_segs[i].rt_cpu);
if (err_segs[i].rt_delay_ms != 0) {
- pr_cont("%s%ldms", firsttime ? "" : "+",
+ pr_cont(" %s%ldms", firsttime ? "" : "+",
err_segs[i].rt_delay_ms);
firsttime = 0;
}
if (err_segs[i].rt_delay_us != 0) {
- pr_cont("%s%ldus", firsttime ? "" : "+",
+ pr_cont(" %s%ldus", firsttime ? "" : "+",
err_segs[i].rt_delay_us);
firsttime = 0;
}
- pr_cont("%s", err_segs[i].rt_preempted ? "preempted" : "");
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST_LOG_CPU))
- pr_cont(" CPU %d", err_segs[i].rt_cpu);
+ pr_cont("%s", err_segs[i].rt_preempted ? " preempted" : "");
+ if (err_segs[i].rt_readstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_BH)
+ pr_cont(" BH");
+ if (err_segs[i].rt_readstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_IRQ)
+ pr_cont(" IRQ");
+ if (err_segs[i].rt_readstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_PREEMPT)
+ pr_cont(" PREEMPT");
+ if (err_segs[i].rt_readstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RBH)
+ pr_cont(" RBH");
+ if (err_segs[i].rt_readstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_SCHED)
+ pr_cont(" SCHED");
+ if (err_segs[i].rt_readstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU_1)
+ pr_cont(" RCU_1");
+ if (err_segs[i].rt_readstate & RCUTORTURE_RDR_RCU_2)
+ pr_cont(" RCU_2");
pr_cont("\n");
}
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-12 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-12 18:49 [PATCH rcu 0/18] RCU torture-test updates for v6.14 Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 01/18] torture: Add dowarn argument to torture_sched_setaffinity() Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 02/18] rcutorture: Add random real-time preemption Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 03/18] rcutorture: Make the TREE03 scenario do preemption Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 04/18] rcutorture: Decorate failing reader segments with CPU ID Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 05/18] rcutorture: Use finer-grained timeouts for rcu_torture_writer() polling Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 06/18] rcutorture: Add ->cond_sync_exp_full function to rcu_ops structure Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 07/18] rcutorture: Check preemption for failing reader Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 08/18] rcutorture: Decorate failing reader segments with last CPU ID Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 09/18] rcutorture: Add full read-side contexts to "busted" torture type Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 11/18] rcutorture: Make rcutorture_one_extend() check reader state Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 12/18] rcutorture: Ignore attempts to test preemption and forward progress Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 13/18] rcutorture: Add documentation for recent conditional and polled APIs Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 14/18] rcutorture: Add parameters to control polled/conditional wait interval Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 15/18] rcutorture: Add preempt_count() to rcutorture_one_extend_check() diagnostics Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 16/18] rcutorture: Read CPU ID for decoration protected by both reader types Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 17/18] rcutorture: Add per-reader-segment preemption diagnostics Paul E. McKenney
2024-12-12 18:49 ` [PATCH rcu 18/18] rcutorture: Use symbols for SRCU reader flavors Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241212184957.2127441-10-paulmck@kernel.org \
--to=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®