From: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Zijun Hu <zijun_hu@icloud.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/7] of: property: Use of_property_present() for of_fwnode_property_present()
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 21:07:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241217-of_core_fix-v3-4-3bc49a2e8bda@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241217-of_core_fix-v3-0-3bc49a2e8bda@quicinc.com>
From: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
Use of_property_present() instead of of_property_read_bool() for
of_fwnode_property_present() since the former is more applicable
obviously.
Signed-off-by: Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com>
---
Hi Rob,
i pick up this change again after some considerations as below:
1) of_property_present() is more suitable than of_property_read_bool()
here, deprecated API is not main reason.
2) it does not conflict with your job which warns when use
of_property_read_bool() for non-bool property.
---
drivers/of/property.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/of/property.c b/drivers/of/property.c
index 519bf9229e613906547b57d8c68e7b8558eff327..dca1a3ebccae1093b2b11f51e8e692bca854d0e3 100644
--- a/drivers/of/property.c
+++ b/drivers/of/property.c
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ of_fwnode_device_get_dma_attr(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
static bool of_fwnode_property_present(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
const char *propname)
{
- return of_property_read_bool(to_of_node(fwnode), propname);
+ return of_property_present(to_of_node(fwnode), propname);
}
static int of_fwnode_property_read_int_array(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-17 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 13:07 [PATCH v3 0/7] of: fix bugs and improve codes Zijun Hu
2024-12-17 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] of: Correct child specifier used as input of the 2nd nexus node Zijun Hu
2024-12-17 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] of: Do not expose of_alias_scan() and correct its comments Zijun Hu
2024-12-17 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] of: Make of_property_present() applicable to all kinds of property Zijun Hu
2024-12-17 13:07 ` Zijun Hu [this message]
2024-12-17 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] of: Fix available buffer size calculating error in API of_device_uevent_modalias() Zijun Hu
2024-12-17 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] of: Fix potential wrong MODALIAS uevent value Zijun Hu
2024-12-17 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] of: Do not expose of_modalias() Zijun Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241217-of_core_fix-v3-4-3bc49a2e8bda@quicinc.com \
--to=zijun_hu@icloud.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®