Re: [PATCH] x86/static-call: fix 32-bit build

[Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>]

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 09:02:28AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> In 32-bit x86 builds CONFIG_STATIC_CALL_INLINE isn't set, leading to
> static_call_initialized not being available.
> 
> Define it as "0" in that case.
> 
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Fixes: 0ef8047b737d ("x86/static-call: provide a way to do very early static-call updates")
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

Works for me -- I seem to have missed those patches landing, and I'm
assuming this patch is going to go along with them others that introduce
the problem.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>

> ---
>  include/linux/static_call.h | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/static_call.h b/include/linux/static_call.h
> index 785980af8972..78a77a4ae0ea 100644
> --- a/include/linux/static_call.h
> +++ b/include/linux/static_call.h
> @@ -138,7 +138,6 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL
>  #include <asm/static_call.h>
>  
> -extern int static_call_initialized;
>  /*
>   * Either @site or @tramp can be NULL.
>   */
> @@ -161,6 +160,8 @@ extern void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void *tramp, void *func, bool
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE
>  
> +extern int static_call_initialized;
> +
>  extern int __init static_call_init(void);
>  
>  extern void static_call_force_reinit(void);
> @@ -226,6 +227,8 @@ extern long __static_call_return0(void);
>  
>  #elif defined(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL)
>  
> +#define static_call_initialized 0
> +
>  static inline int static_call_init(void) { return 0; }
>  
>  #define DEFINE_STATIC_CALL(name, _func)					\
> @@ -282,6 +285,8 @@ extern long __static_call_return0(void);
>  
>  #else /* Generic implementation */
>  
> +#define static_call_initialized 0
> +
>  static inline int static_call_init(void) { return 0; }
>  
>  static inline long __static_call_return0(void)
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
>