From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, leiyang@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: Treat TDP MMU faults as spurious if access is already allowed
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 13:36:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241218213611.3181643-1-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
Treat slow-path TDP MMU faults as spurious if the access is allowed given
the existing SPTE to fix a benign warning (other than the WARN itself)
due to replacing a writable SPTE with a read-only SPTE, and to avoid the
unnecessary LOCK CMPXCHG and subsequent TLB flush.
If a read fault races with a write fault, fast GUP fails for any reason
when trying to "promote" the read fault to a writable mapping, and KVM
resolves the write fault first, then KVM will end up trying to install a
read-only SPTE (for a !map_writable fault) overtop a writable SPTE.
Note, it's not entirely clear why fast GUP fails, or if that's even how
KVM ends up with a !map_writable fault with a writable SPTE. If something
else is going awry, e.g. due to a bug in mmu_notifiers, then treating read
faults as spurious in this scenario could effectively mask the underlying
problem.
However, retrying the faulting access instead of overwriting an existing
SPTE is functionally correct and desirable irrespective of the WARN, and
fast GUP _can_ legitimately fail with a writable VMA, e.g. if the Accessed
bit in primary MMU's PTE is toggled and causes a PTE value mismatch. The
WARN was also recently added, specifically to track down scenarios where
KVM is unnecessarily overwrites SPTEs, i.e. treating the fault as spurious
doesn't regress KVM's bug-finding capabilities in any way. In short,
letting the WARN linger because there's a tiny chance it's due to a bug
elsewhere would be excessively paranoid.
Fixes: 1a175082b190 ("KVM: x86/mmu: WARN and flush if resolving a TDP MMU fault clears MMU-writable")
Reported-by: leiyang@redhat.com
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219588
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 12 ------------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 5 +++++
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 22e7ad235123..2401606db260 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -3364,18 +3364,6 @@ static bool fast_pf_fix_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
return true;
}
-static bool is_access_allowed(struct kvm_page_fault *fault, u64 spte)
-{
- if (fault->exec)
- return is_executable_pte(spte);
-
- if (fault->write)
- return is_writable_pte(spte);
-
- /* Fault was on Read access */
- return spte & PT_PRESENT_MASK;
-}
-
/*
* Returns the last level spte pointer of the shadow page walk for the given
* gpa, and sets *spte to the spte value. This spte may be non-preset. If no
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index f332b33bc817..af10bc0380a3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -461,6 +461,23 @@ static inline bool is_mmu_writable_spte(u64 spte)
return spte & shadow_mmu_writable_mask;
}
+/*
+ * Returns true if the access indicated by @fault is allowed by the existing
+ * SPTE protections. Note, the caller is responsible for checking that the
+ * SPTE is a shadow-present, leaf SPTE (either before or after).
+ */
+static inline bool is_access_allowed(struct kvm_page_fault *fault, u64 spte)
+{
+ if (fault->exec)
+ return is_executable_pte(spte);
+
+ if (fault->write)
+ return is_writable_pte(spte);
+
+ /* Fault was on Read access */
+ return spte & PT_PRESENT_MASK;
+}
+
/*
* If the MMU-writable flag is cleared, i.e. the SPTE is write-protected for
* write-tracking, remote TLBs must be flushed, even if the SPTE was read-only,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 4508d868f1cd..2f15e0e33903 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -985,6 +985,11 @@ static int tdp_mmu_map_handle_target_level(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (fault->prefetch && is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte))
return RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
+ if (is_shadow_present_pte(iter->old_spte) &&
+ is_access_allowed(fault, iter->old_spte) &&
+ is_last_spte(iter->old_spte, iter->level))
+ return RET_PF_SPURIOUS;
+
if (unlikely(!fault->slot))
new_spte = make_mmio_spte(vcpu, iter->gfn, ACC_ALL);
else
base-commit: 3522c419758ee8dca5a0e8753ee0070a22157bc1
--
2.47.1.613.gc27f4b7a9f-goog
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-18 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 21:36 Sean Christopherson [this message]
2024-12-19 2:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-19 14:55 ` Lei Yang
2024-12-20 3:17 ` Yan Zhao
2024-12-20 15:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-23 5:30 ` Yan Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241218213611.3181643-1-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leiyang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®