From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 772F92AE77 for ; Sat, 21 Dec 2024 02:36:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734748610; cv=none; b=JSn7GGuQMPx/vBl6wA7H+HtiJBVEMkqofPCLCDjqTd1lv8P43YyMB5Pb0QfYpcMzFYIHZuxl4m832ma3xrE/1nCSzpyWeRnU1bfa0tNXtowjt/BZBfkz1FYBm5hq5jNlb2sIzbLDfqzBJ1JmvOE3+bxkQSY9g2CMq1dgt8Az7qo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734748610; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WdZM0GfGSN2UUn+BEAxxdyQZqk0ypzsGVOoLzQK4Avk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lN4rLg1Tvuve4e+Ds4pjjbyVNj0/DLIKiJohsDWlHVv136vADLRRaxEiFFx85vWRi3jZeauUXV2nOgitQ/GPEVrvz6dh/elbUDzyvxm3Nq+zK12815+578yTeJcPLIPlZR8k6lFLgo3Jauh/NTIR2HFNxT+2qhnfr3SigRJ+k4A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TUVvpAjS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TUVvpAjS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1734748608; x=1766284608; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=WdZM0GfGSN2UUn+BEAxxdyQZqk0ypzsGVOoLzQK4Avk=; b=TUVvpAjSkWxbPN4JqA8Fzdnqt+vY1WSTpdOgyKXO45siufCNCpdNsQc2 e+Xo7ovCcoqcRBeromEXuTYw+09DjgjoaQWilLFl10qAkcfJiGJnsQ5lN cALx1U6mdOxCtROSL1eYCEAQINKi39pQ0AAs/iOpcJ/BfRr2ThWCKUlNz w0w5TWkd1nM6CuWSHv+Re4wk5leeiWUg1+wWFmmEcZpRwVD+noECEbnky 6+Hl6S8sMWPI9dN8LZ4y5KCAfLMu2yIi6FrTRgZsrKPqeyeUaEJos4Q/Y qgrQqSJJLJbdsCbGfXcVrH2Xx1uuM12/2w1WRr1EqAUDWEWPRCZyy/OS+ w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: FbCmp+gSThSmltRb4jkDUw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: YP4YJjjlSQ+DjzuJhpvsOQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11292"; a="34622122" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,252,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="34622122" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 Dec 2024 18:36:47 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: YdLfPWEpS3OkH9vLPiVpMg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MMYOyeO9S5WViMDJD0AkHg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="99514935" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO a46f226878e0) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Dec 2024 18:36:44 -0800 Received: from kbuild by a46f226878e0 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1tOpM9-0001rt-0N; Sat, 21 Dec 2024 02:36:41 +0000 Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 10:35:45 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Chen Ridong , akpm@linux-foundation.org, mhocko@suse.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org, yosryahmed@google.com, yuzhao@google.com, david@redhat.com, willy@infradead.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, baohua@kernel.org, 21cnbao@gmail.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chenridong@huawei.com, wangweiyang2@huawei.com, xieym_ict@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5] mm: vmscan: retry folios written back while isolated for traditional LRU Message-ID: <202412211023.UIBZqNFK-lkp@intel.com> References: <20241220010931.3603111-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241220010931.3603111-1-chenridong@huaweicloud.com> Hi Chen, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on akpm-mm/mm-everything] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chen-Ridong/mm-vmscan-retry-folios-written-back-while-isolated-for-traditional-LRU/20241220-092147 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-everything patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241220010931.3603111-1-chenridong%40huaweicloud.com patch subject: [PATCH -next v5] mm: vmscan: retry folios written back while isolated for traditional LRU config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-003-20241220 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241221/202412211023.UIBZqNFK-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20241221/202412211023.UIBZqNFK-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202412211023.UIBZqNFK-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/migrate.h:8, from mm/vmscan.c:42: include/linux/hugetlb.h:1063:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'replace_free_hugepage_folios' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 1063 | int replace_free_hugepage_folios(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ mm/vmscan.c: In function 'find_folios_written_back': >> mm/vmscan.c:313:43: error: implicit declaration of function 'lru_gen_distance'; did you mean 'node_distance'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 313 | if (lru_gen_enabled() && !lru_gen_distance(folio, false)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | node_distance cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +313 mm/vmscan.c 285 286 /** 287 * find_folios_written_back - Find and move the written back folios to a new list. 288 * @list: filios list 289 * @clean: the written back folios list 290 * @is_retried: whether the list has already been retried. 291 */ 292 static inline void find_folios_written_back(struct list_head *list, 293 struct list_head *clean, bool is_retried) 294 { 295 struct folio *folio; 296 struct folio *next; 297 298 list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(folio, next, list, lru) { 299 if (!folio_evictable(folio)) { 300 list_del(&folio->lru); 301 folio_putback_lru(folio); 302 continue; 303 } 304 305 /* retry folios that may have missed folio_rotate_reclaimable() */ 306 if (!is_retried && !folio_test_active(folio) && !folio_mapped(folio) && 307 !folio_test_dirty(folio) && !folio_test_writeback(folio)) { 308 list_move(&folio->lru, clean); 309 continue; 310 } 311 312 /* don't add rejected folios to the oldest generation */ > 313 if (lru_gen_enabled() && !lru_gen_distance(folio, false)) 314 set_mask_bits(&folio->flags, LRU_REFS_FLAGS, BIT(PG_active)); 315 } 316 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki