From: Vitaliy Shevtsov <v.shevtsov@maxima.ru>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
Cc: Vitaliy Shevtsov <v.shevtsov@maxima.ru>,
<openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lvc-project@linuxtesting.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ipmi: make ipmi_destroy_user() return void
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2024 01:45:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241225014532.20091-1-v.shevtsov@maxima.ru> (raw)
Return value of ipmi_destroy_user() has no meaning, because it's always
zero and callers can do nothing with it. And in most cases it's not
checked. So make this function return void. This also will eliminate static
code analyzer warnings such as unreachable code/redundant comparison when
the return value is checked against non-zero value.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace.
Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Shevtsov <v.shevtsov@maxima.ru>
---
v2: Add changes in drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c missed by chance
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_devintf.c | 5 +----
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 4 +---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c | 6 +-----
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c | 5 +----
include/linux/ipmi.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_devintf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_devintf.c
index 332082e02ea5..e6ba35b71f10 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_devintf.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_devintf.c
@@ -122,12 +122,9 @@ static int ipmi_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
static int ipmi_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
struct ipmi_file_private *priv = file->private_data;
- int rv;
struct ipmi_recv_msg *msg, *next;
- rv = ipmi_destroy_user(priv->user);
- if (rv)
- return rv;
+ ipmi_destroy_user(priv->user);
list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, next, &priv->recv_msgs, link)
ipmi_free_recv_msg(msg);
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index e12b531f5c2f..1e5313748f8b 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -1398,13 +1398,11 @@ static void _ipmi_destroy_user(struct ipmi_user *user)
module_put(owner);
}
-int ipmi_destroy_user(struct ipmi_user *user)
+void ipmi_destroy_user(struct ipmi_user *user)
{
_ipmi_destroy_user(user);
kref_put(&user->refcount, free_user);
-
- return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ipmi_destroy_user);
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c
index 941d2dcc8c9d..05f17e3e6207 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_poweroff.c
@@ -699,8 +699,6 @@ static int __init ipmi_poweroff_init(void)
#ifdef MODULE
static void __exit ipmi_poweroff_cleanup(void)
{
- int rv;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
unregister_sysctl_table(ipmi_table_header);
#endif
@@ -708,9 +706,7 @@ static void __exit ipmi_poweroff_cleanup(void)
ipmi_smi_watcher_unregister(&smi_watcher);
if (ready) {
- rv = ipmi_destroy_user(ipmi_user);
- if (rv)
- pr_err("could not cleanup the IPMI user: 0x%x\n", rv);
+ ipmi_destroy_user(ipmi_user);
pm_power_off = old_poweroff_func;
}
}
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
index 335eea80054e..f1875b2bebbc 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_watchdog.c
@@ -1064,7 +1064,6 @@ static void ipmi_register_watchdog(int ipmi_intf)
static void ipmi_unregister_watchdog(int ipmi_intf)
{
- int rv;
struct ipmi_user *loc_user = watchdog_user;
if (!loc_user)
@@ -1089,9 +1088,7 @@ static void ipmi_unregister_watchdog(int ipmi_intf)
mutex_lock(&ipmi_watchdog_mutex);
/* Disconnect from IPMI. */
- rv = ipmi_destroy_user(loc_user);
- if (rv)
- pr_warn("error unlinking from IPMI: %d\n", rv);
+ ipmi_destroy_user(loc_user);
/* If it comes back, restart it properly. */
ipmi_start_timer_on_heartbeat = 1;
diff --git a/include/linux/ipmi.h b/include/linux/ipmi.h
index a1c9c0d48ebf..2f74dd90c271 100644
--- a/include/linux/ipmi.h
+++ b/include/linux/ipmi.h
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ int ipmi_create_user(unsigned int if_num,
* the users before you destroy the callback structures, it should be
* safe, too.
*/
-int ipmi_destroy_user(struct ipmi_user *user);
+void ipmi_destroy_user(struct ipmi_user *user);
/* Get the IPMI version of the BMC we are talking to. */
int ipmi_get_version(struct ipmi_user *user,
--
2.47.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-12-24 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-25 1:45 Vitaliy Shevtsov [this message]
2025-01-03 3:13 ` Corey Minyard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241225014532.20091-1-v.shevtsov@maxima.ru \
--to=v.shevtsov@maxima.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®