From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E319FA41
	for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Fri,  3 Jan 2025 00:03:15 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1735862596; cv=none; b=uuiOGIuH28rHQSJwJE41xT05itXsWWVuV/+hpOyHKWNgM8qN/ix701eq0KaihBUZT5m4tH8qDTH/ykK4OGGAUHNR3bJcFvCgWsMzmmOe4uWgKH/CoU5Yb/y24K/jqWQAmyGMegklE3CPqjIiQJExT1I8HTYUEmoYIOnBrXjjlr8=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1735862596; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=x2VLfrE/gbkv7m3PYXpURmHeJ/YhZy+N3+C71KyABj8=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:
	 Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=s5162pUl+m6dzRprdJ3doYeXkpwRn+Fnw4KJyUtFjvdEQ0akfFA3VK54Qu7RjZ1PZzYoBHJ+kUIQQ2LybuNxBE2N11TCXlIVwvi390TT4K6a+OfJ03oppO/tARex+5/lIOeROy6S7Oqey5glFtrjRZ73cv0Bk08pAyx2LdpLyU4=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=gXCLTx3m; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="gXCLTx3m"
Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B2B0C4CED0;
	Fri,  3 Jan 2025 00:03:15 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org;
	s=korg; t=1735862595;
	bh=x2VLfrE/gbkv7m3PYXpURmHeJ/YhZy+N3+C71KyABj8=;
	h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=gXCLTx3m9wWC4pEOirv/8kcE19aR+39+GCZ1vyxigmMgvXl/p/kG9J/kqo/2teLh9
	 95HNc0oAlTgtmO2YeiE9kx7i1Injgpz7qbWfhNTwkVw9GOY3W7SUFPwzsqht4N1dza
	 SUh3xcmo185XXJyTn0BX7vbnqwQXk3SUFDgcus9Y=
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 16:03:14 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chen Ridong
 <chenridong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mm-unstable v4 0/7] mm/mglru: performance optimizations
Message-Id: <20250102160314.20813f37b0bf748c3a06e877@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <20241231043538.4075764-1-yuzhao@google.com>
References: <20241231043538.4075764-1-yuzhao@google.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 21:35:31 -0700 Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrote:

> This series improves performance for some previously reported test
> cases. Most of the code changes gathered here has been floating on the
> mailing list [1][2]. They are now properly organized and have gone
> through various benchmarks on client and server devices, including
> Android, FIO, memcached, multiple VMs and MongoDB.

This series has significant conflicts with the patch "mm: vmscan: retry
folios written back while isolated for traditional LRU".  It appears
that "mm: vmscan: retry folios written back while isolated for
traditional LRU" is due for an update and that more discussion is
needed, so I shall drop this version of "mm: vmscan: retry folios
written back while isolated for traditional LRU" from mm-unstable.