mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
Cc: joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iommu: fix wrong DMA ops for iommu device
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2025 15:34:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250103153434.GC3816@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <91d15d11-ec53-4ca2-a385-9fa69d861f2c@quicinc.com>

(Please try not to top-post as it makes the thread hard to follow)

On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 04:09:46PM +0530, Charan Teja Kalla wrote:
> On 12/13/2024 8:34 PM, Charan Teja Kalla wrote:
> > Race between smmu device probe and iommu device probe is resulting into
> > wrong DMA ops used for the device.
> > 
> > bus_iommu_probe(P1)                  of_iommu_configure(P2)
> > (from iommu_device_register)        (from insmod of a driver)
> > --------------------------         --------------------------
> > 1) probe_iommu_group()
> > (Fills just dev->iommu_group
> > under iommu_probe_device_lock)
> > 				2) iommu_probe_device():
> > 				  (acquires the iommu_probe_device_lock,
> > 				   but since dev->iommu_group is already
> > 				   set, it just returns without
> > 				   allocating the domain.)
> > 
> > 				3) of_dma_configure_id()->
> > 				   arch_setup_dma_ops() gets called for
> > 				   this device, but returns with the
> > 				   error message:
> > 				   "Failed to set up IOMMU for device;
> > 				    retaining platform DMA ops"
> > 
> > 				4) device probe is succeeded where it
> > 				   can now setup iommu mappings using
> > 				   wrong ->dma_ops
> > 
> > 5) domain will be allocated later
> > and fills iommu_group->domain.
> > 
> > Step 3) and 4) denies iommu device from using 'iommu_dma_ops'.
> > 
> > This issue does exists on 6.6 because of commit f188056352bc ("iommu:
> > Avoid locking/unlocking for iommu_probe_device()") without which 2)
> > returns only after filling the domain under group->mutex, thus no issue.
> > 
> > With commit b5c58b2fdc42("dma-mapping: direct calls for dma-iommu"),
> > ->iommu_dma_ops is removed altogether and iommu api are directly being
> > called under "use_dma_iommu(): return dev->dma_iommu". Again,
> > ->dma_iommu flag is set only after domain allocation. So, If
> > there is a sufficient delay between steps 4) and 5), issue is still
> > exists but that seems very narrow to me.
> > 
> > I am thinking, setup of the domain before returning from step2) is the
> > way to fix this issue. Can you please help if you have any suggestions?
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Just a quick ask if you have any comments for the below. BTW, in
> internal tests, when we revert the commit f188056352bc ("iommu: Avoid
> locking/unlocking for iommu_probe_device()", it is helping.
> 
> I can share more details If the below is not sufficient.
> 
> Thanks in advance...

Can you reproduce the issue on 6.13-rc5? We bodged some of the probe
code recently:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=229e6ee43d2a160a1592b83aad620d6027084aad

and a better set of fixes are queued in -next.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-03 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-13 15:04 Charan Teja Kalla
2025-01-02 10:39 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2025-01-03 15:34   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-01-06 13:16     ` Charan Teja Kalla
2025-01-07 11:31       ` Will Deacon
2025-01-08 12:37         ` Robin Murphy
2025-01-10 13:29           ` Charan Teja Kalla
2025-01-13 17:25             ` Robin Murphy
2025-01-20 12:15               ` Charan Teja Kalla
2025-01-22  5:39                 ` Charan Teja Kalla
2025-01-22 14:43                   ` Robin Murphy
2025-01-24  0:32                     ` Charan Teja Kalla
2025-01-24 14:17                       ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250103153434.GC3816@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_charante@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®