Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] regulator: tps65215: Add chip_data struct for multi-PMIC support

[kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>]

Hi Shree,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on broonie-regulator/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on next-20241220]
[cannot apply to robh/for-next tmlind-omap/for-next linus/master v6.13-rc5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Shree-Ramamoorthy/regulator-dt-bindings-Add-TI-TPS65215-PMIC-bindings/20250104-070914
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250103230446.197597-5-s-ramamoorthy%40ti.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] regulator: tps65215: Add chip_data struct for multi-PMIC support
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-004-20250104 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250104/202501041724.qQwuHm5z-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250104/202501041724.qQwuHm5z-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501041724.qQwuHm5z-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:266:44: error: 'TPS65215_LDO_2' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'TPS65219_LDO_2'?
     266 |         TPS65219_REGULATOR("LDO2", "ldo2", TPS65215_LDO_2,
         |                                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:104:43: note: in definition of macro 'TPS65219_REGULATOR'
     104 |                 .id                     = _id,                          \
         |                                           ^~~
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:268:28: error: 'TPS65215_REG_LDO2_VOUT' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'TPS65219_REG_LDO2_VOUT'?
     268 |                            TPS65215_REG_LDO2_VOUT,
         |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:109:43: note: in definition of macro 'TPS65219_REGULATOR'
     109 |                 .vsel_reg               = _vr,                          \
         |                                           ^~~
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:271:28: error: 'TPS65215_ENABLE_LDO2_EN_MASK' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'TPS65219_ENABLE_LDO2_EN_MASK'?
     271 |                            TPS65215_ENABLE_LDO2_EN_MASK, 0, 0, tps65215_ldo_2_range,
         |                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:116:43: note: in definition of macro 'TPS65219_REGULATOR'
     116 |                 .enable_mask            = _em,                          \
         |                                           ^~~
>> drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:330:10: error: 'TPS65215' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'TPS65219'?
     330 |         [TPS65215] = {
         |          ^~~~~~~~
         |          TPS65219
>> drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:330:10: error: array index in initializer not of integer type
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:330:10: note: (near initialization for 'chip_info_table')
   In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:16,
                    from drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:13:
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c: In function 'tps65219_regulator_probe':
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:365:36: error: 'regulators' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'regulator'?
     365 |         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regulators); i++) {
         |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/array_size.h:11:33: note: in definition of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
      11 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr))
         |                                 ^~~
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:365:36: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
     365 |         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regulators); i++) {
         |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/array_size.h:11:33: note: in definition of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
      11 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr))
         |                                 ^~~
   In file included from include/linux/array_size.h:5:
   include/linux/compiler.h:245:77: error: expression in static assertion is not an integer
     245 | #define __BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO_MSG(e, msg) ((int)sizeof(struct {_Static_assert(!(e), msg);}))
         |                                                                             ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:249:33: note: in expansion of macro '__BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO_MSG'
     249 | #define __must_be_array(a)      __BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO_MSG(__same_type((a), &(a)[0]), "must be array")
         |                                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/array_size.h:11:59: note: in expansion of macro '__must_be_array'
      11 | #define ARRAY_SIZE(arr) (sizeof(arr) / sizeof((arr)[0]) + __must_be_array(arr))
         |                                                           ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:365:25: note: in expansion of macro 'ARRAY_SIZE'
     365 |         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regulators); i++) {
         |                         ^~~~~~~~~~
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c: At top level:
   drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c:329:34: warning: 'chip_info_table' defined but not used [-Wunused-variable]
     329 | static struct tps65219_chip_data chip_info_table[] = {
         |                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +330 drivers/regulator/tps65219-regulator.c

   328	
   329	static struct tps65219_chip_data chip_info_table[] = {
 > 330		[TPS65215] = {
   331			.rdesc = tps65215_regs,
   332			.rdesc_size = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65215_regs),
   333			.common_rdesc = common_regs,
   334			.common_rdesc_size = ARRAY_SIZE(common_regs),
   335			.common_irq_types = common_regulator_irq_types,
   336			.common_irq_size = ARRAY_SIZE(common_regulator_irq_types),
   337		},
   338		[TPS65219] = {
   339			.rdesc = tps65219_regs,
   340			.rdesc_size = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65219_regs),
   341			.common_rdesc = common_regs,
   342			.common_rdesc_size = ARRAY_SIZE(common_regs),
   343			.common_irq_types = common_regulator_irq_types,
   344			.common_irq_size = ARRAY_SIZE(common_regulator_irq_types),
   345			.irq_types = tps65219_regulator_irq_types,
   346			.dev_irq_size = ARRAY_SIZE(tps65219_regulator_irq_types),
   347		},
   348	};
   349	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki