From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CCAA1FCFF4; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736417498; cv=none; b=mXtZFBuYn37xMlsurBgYx7M70J/7Bpg2ZhRYzhxbpKxlWS9rZxOrtRvqS+hctfabfgWBUStx1zl7on5FXHeNlaJ3JxbxSlY13cQgbB8xluDx3wCNqKATSb4CkrvGuS2/EhRuljRCz9NlcSQeaoPyzJlDbxr4r0QGwLndjdt8O/Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736417498; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VY3waFc3QsqqVOjn+0pJXXc0h0YRwAo6/oRgh/vOkP0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kARhvcbjtYrweqymbXhSBfewt7s+XWpkjOw5JMRzTEwHILlkc32uYJrTcoyQ5Pcb2Pi295410uwecbzU72swjhYBVjwnx6KzlDWPISJB5NupgnqRkYj6EitqXfTZo4LUVZKHHGOaK1fanujZnGL/HBfFq5ZebEvIcfx5On0S/WI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=h6KMGJ9O; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=hl4zjEZN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="h6KMGJ9O"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="hl4zjEZN" Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 11:11:33 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1736417495; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XTEHeGcSL5ZHkWRPY4ERD0o2U5+jD0Nv8pvCPq13Cgw=; b=h6KMGJ9OFUgmWNSWx8iW2tqUSX9ODPHCLVomyQCYGu+Ynt8CpxWvINMQaNTFvxOkLnAxgG pPUXb26wbS6JBNbXCszijMN3vlJyf5sLU/RcWZQGCdZS9/pMz7TrUt1L6a+47YLX+iBgjs qMuRThEUaXidFQIcJfmiC2VQjEGiLkODE9OA2sQ6yh5BOVq/UAaggt9hf45PQjwqptt2Gk 1knVZ5AJOyOOAwMRJhPcJiCNNJrQW+TGo8JmoroXeRHdTBghbvVQSFo5IdnJICnMi7vg3t YDMa/MMD36JRBST0T3/DuoKzndxlVdJ6kmhIjniZxK6syyffbOaDOlAITWHagQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1736417495; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XTEHeGcSL5ZHkWRPY4ERD0o2U5+jD0Nv8pvCPq13Cgw=; b=hl4zjEZNAWC4Gn7oWBQUCrp+sSDK8nZDrnc1GbZnYZ/mBcnFvDYdgusQ8gyiEBbGjDJMZH HpsOmysU7WdP4NCw== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Petr Tesarik Cc: Thomas Gleixner , linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, LKML , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v6.13-rc1-rt1 Message-ID: <20250109101133.c7rK5UDy@linutronix.de> References: <20241206154701.8XBv1qNE@linutronix.de> <20241216165248.5cae6311@mordecai.tesarici.cz> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241216165248.5cae6311@mordecai.tesarici.cz> On 2024-12-16 16:52:48 [+0100], Petr Tesarik wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi, > > However, I found 26 patches in v6.13-rc1-rt1-patches: > > petr@mordecai:~/src/linux> git ls-tree v6.13-rc1-rt1-patches:patches | grep '\.patch$' | wc -l > 26 > > It turns out, that these two patch files are orphaned (not listed in > series): > - netfilter-nft_counter-Use-u64_stats_t-for-statistic.patch > - riscv-add-PREEMPT_AUTO-support.patch > > What is the reason to keep them around? Is it even intentional? Nope. I forgot to delete them after I removed them from the series file. Both were applied upstream. I just dropped them from the recent -rt3 release. Thanks for the note. > Petr T Sebastian