From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from shelob.surriel.com (shelob.surriel.com [96.67.55.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F3D51BCA0E for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 15:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=96.67.55.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736697314; cv=none; b=H/seIzxeGOEiSYEoaiIzFXUXA2Bbuw2K3T+EBNLy2mgvcAaCiQhcrYPEWmUgRqbDZ8huDtZAyAf6V9OhgMoNvv77zPkaRbBRQ15Fojl+iwbIVk4iEnCy8zjo/nA9n0VLPPLkJGatdlDX6vT4Zhv8XaZHHSog2UkMDBvKG9DkLO8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736697314; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7L5nLvpkMoTaQrUvWDIx0lm//PHrN1RZPGTYAF+53JE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=f7mbcFMjDvjL2TwB+36/1PpsIWgD9bgAT/SxsJqvPieuxIDUqdMfQ+7nt6T1lVHBm0n/s8aB24MYbcXbO/NwVj0EfF+TM4yYZvPkrE+LizScPHdJaf5d57yV9FnfA2JmHfC2Pvldc+hyr8I2dooVu06a4ktMhPMp1SeGcctiLfY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=surriel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=shelob.surriel.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=96.67.55.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=surriel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=shelob.surriel.com Received: from fangorn.home.surriel.com ([10.0.13.7]) by shelob.surriel.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.97.1) (envelope-from ) id 1tX0Ii-0000000010W-3ULi; Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:54:56 -0500 From: Rik van Riel To: x86@kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, peterz@infradead.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, nadav.amit@gmail.com, thomas.lendacky@amd.com, kernel-team@meta.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, jannh@google.com, Rik van Riel Subject: [PATCH v4 10/12] x86,tlb: do targeted broadcast flushing from tlbbatch code Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 10:53:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20250112155453.1104139-11-riel@surriel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.47.1 In-Reply-To: <20250112155453.1104139-1-riel@surriel.com> References: <20250112155453.1104139-1-riel@surriel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: riel@surriel.com Instead of doing a system-wide TLB flush from arch_tlbbatch_flush, queue up asynchronous, targeted flushes from arch_tlbbatch_add_pending. This also allows us to avoid adding the CPUs of processes using broadcast flushing to the batch->cpumask, and will hopefully further reduce TLB flushing from the reclaim and compaction paths. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel --- arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 12 +++------- arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h index 1ad56eb3e8a8..f9a17edf63ad 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbbatch.h @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch { * the PFNs being flushed.. */ struct cpumask cpumask; + bool used_invlpgb; }; #endif /* _ARCH_X86_TLBBATCH_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h index cd244cdd49dd..fa4fcafa8b87 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h @@ -350,21 +350,15 @@ static inline u64 inc_mm_tlb_gen(struct mm_struct *mm) return atomic64_inc_return(&mm->context.tlb_gen); } -static inline void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch, - struct mm_struct *mm, - unsigned long uaddr) -{ - inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm); - cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm)); - mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL); -} - static inline void arch_flush_tlb_batched_pending(struct mm_struct *mm) { flush_tlb_mm(mm); } extern void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch); +extern void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch, + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long uaddr); static inline bool pte_flags_need_flush(unsigned long oldflags, unsigned long newflags, diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c index 80375ef186d5..532911fbb12a 100644 --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c @@ -1658,9 +1658,7 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch) * a local TLB flush is needed. Optimize this use-case by calling * flush_tlb_func_local() directly in this case. */ - if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB)) { - invlpgb_flush_all_nonglobals(); - } else if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) { + if (cpumask_any_but(&batch->cpumask, cpu) < nr_cpu_ids) { flush_tlb_multi(&batch->cpumask, info); } else if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) { lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled(); @@ -1669,12 +1667,49 @@ void arch_tlbbatch_flush(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch) local_irq_enable(); } + /* + * If we issued (asynchronous) INVLPGB flushes, wait for them here. + * The cpumask above contains only CPUs that were running tasks + * not using broadcast TLB flushing. + */ + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB) && batch->used_invlpgb) { + tlbsync(); + migrate_enable(); + batch->used_invlpgb = false; + } + cpumask_clear(&batch->cpumask); put_flush_tlb_info(); put_cpu(); } +void arch_tlbbatch_add_pending(struct arch_tlbflush_unmap_batch *batch, + struct mm_struct *mm, + unsigned long uaddr) +{ + if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INVLPGB) && mm_global_asid(mm)) { + u16 asid = mm_global_asid(mm); + /* + * Queue up an asynchronous invalidation. The corresponding + * TLBSYNC is done in arch_tlbbatch_flush(), and must be done + * on the same CPU. + */ + if (!batch->used_invlpgb) { + batch->used_invlpgb = true; + migrate_disable(); + } + invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(kern_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, false); + /* Do any CPUs supporting INVLPGB need PTI? */ + if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PTI)) + invlpgb_flush_user_nr_nosync(user_pcid(asid), uaddr, 1, false); + } else { + inc_mm_tlb_gen(mm); + cpumask_or(&batch->cpumask, &batch->cpumask, mm_cpumask(mm)); + } + mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(mm, 0, -1UL); +} + /* * Blindly accessing user memory from NMI context can be dangerous * if we're in the middle of switching the current user task or -- 2.47.1