From: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
German Maglione <gmaglione@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [RFC 5/5] virtiofs: perform DMA operations out of the spinlock
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 17:31:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250122163154.1225353-6-eperezma@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250122163154.1225353-1-eperezma@redhat.com>
This is useful for some setups like swiotlb or VDUSE where the DMA
operations are expensive and/or need to be performed with a write lock.
After applying this patch, fio read test goes from 1201MiB/s to 1211MiB/s.
Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 2 ++
fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index e49912fa77c5..eb22bfcb9100 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -580,6 +580,7 @@ int virtqueue_map_sgs(struct virtqueue *_vq,
goto unmap_release;
sg_dma_address(sg) = addr;
+ sg_dma_len(sg) = sg->length;
mapped_sg++;
}
}
@@ -592,6 +593,7 @@ int virtqueue_map_sgs(struct virtqueue *_vq,
goto unmap_release;
sg_dma_address(sg) = addr;
+ sg_dma_len(sg) = sg->length;
mapped_sg++;
}
}
diff --git a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
index 1344c5782a7c..2b558b05d0f8 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/virtio_fs.c
@@ -836,8 +836,21 @@ static void virtio_fs_requests_done_work(struct work_struct *work)
/* End requests */
list_for_each_entry_safe(req, next, &reqs, list) {
+ struct scatterlist *stack_sgs[6];
+ struct scatterlist **sgs = stack_sgs;
+ unsigned int total_sgs = req->out_sgs + req->in_sgs;
+
list_del_init(&req->list);
+ /* TODO replace magic 6 by a macro */
+ if (total_sgs > 6)
+ sgs = kmalloc_array(total_sgs, sizeof(sgs[0]), GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+ for (unsigned int i = 0; i < total_sgs; ++i)
+ sgs[i] = &req->sg[i];
+
+ virtqueue_unmap_sgs(vq, sgs, req->out_sgs, req->in_sgs);
+
/* blocking async request completes in a worker context */
if (req->args->may_block) {
struct virtio_fs_req_work *w;
@@ -850,6 +863,9 @@ static void virtio_fs_requests_done_work(struct work_struct *work)
} else {
virtio_fs_request_complete(req, fsvq);
}
+
+ if (sgs != stack_sgs)
+ kfree(sgs);
}
/* Try to push previously queued requests, as the queue might no longer be full */
@@ -1426,6 +1442,11 @@ static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
sgs[i] = &req->sg[i];
WARN_ON(req->out_sgs + req->in_sgs != total_sgs);
+ // TODO can we change this ptr out of the lock?
+ vq = fsvq->vq;
+ // TODO handle this and following errors
+ ret = virtqueue_map_sgs(vq, sgs, req->out_sgs, req->in_sgs);
+ BUG_ON(ret < 0);
spin_lock(&fsvq->lock);
if (!fsvq->connected) {
@@ -1434,8 +1455,8 @@ static int virtio_fs_enqueue_req(struct virtio_fs_vq *fsvq,
goto out;
}
- vq = fsvq->vq;
- ret = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, req->out_sgs, req->in_sgs, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ ret = virtqueue_add_sgs_premapped(vq, sgs, req->out_sgs,
+ req->in_sgs, req, GFP_ATOMIC);
if (ret < 0) {
spin_unlock(&fsvq->lock);
goto out;
--
2.48.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-22 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-22 16:31 [RFC 0/5] virtiofs: map buffer out of virtqueue lock Eugenio Pérez
2025-01-22 16:31 ` [RFC 1/5] vduse: add virtio_fs to allowed dev id Eugenio Pérez
2025-01-23 1:48 ` Jason Wang
2025-01-22 16:31 ` [RFC 2/5] virtio_ring: introduce virtqueue_map/unmap_sgs() Eugenio Pérez
2025-01-23 1:51 ` Jason Wang
2025-01-23 7:31 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-01-24 1:03 ` Jason Wang
2025-01-22 16:31 ` [RFC 3/5] virtiofs: Move stack sg to fuse_req Eugenio Pérez
2025-01-23 1:54 ` Jason Wang
2025-01-23 7:33 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2025-01-22 16:31 ` [RFC 4/5] virtio_ring: add virtqueue premapped out/in buffers support Eugenio Pérez
2025-01-22 16:31 ` Eugenio Pérez [this message]
2025-01-23 1:56 ` [RFC 5/5] virtiofs: perform DMA operations out of the spinlock Jason Wang
2025-01-23 2:26 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250122163154.1225353-6-eperezma@redhat.com \
--to=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=gmaglione@redhat.com \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®