From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E791E480 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 01:55:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737770107; cv=none; b=A5NnLnw1fZuVhCqiQsiN6wVLGBcZqvSvpZLR8l15g5KMu2ROW9fx08ULqlquPEj+woMg8NK9o4xH5PqJwFGuSFrGTHzanlfygUDJ8le3Dyihl4M8Q6v6SYaDjNqdBl6hohWk/JaW7/ZustxkpKpHcyte9xHVuOVcVKVOeiMkCBA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737770107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=soWic9icTSEf71nsOfx9jjVBbFf3TJr4FOEdysvdfQE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=Z5/B+/Qs1aqa2GyurAjXV06qUb7RYU1ewViNxDdC3MYtP/uto3L/pF6Oujf2b8tDj/RFoPfrBxwsnYdRodHuuFWyazOEbR2l9jkrbf5R2p7ySvTWPPdFBBlk5p8HotadIT0l9VTW6/rCYHimJPBbwbIk6zRRIRxZnHh57tvCU4A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=il55N9h8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="il55N9h8" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1737770105; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MqMpFj0aSMLsbftkTfQBuLow6CzcwZAvTx4Ts0A4x30=; b=il55N9h8I6Q9ap/c/UrwfFDBkoJQhC5dL+OXBxsU10zWMew5qPkeBr77UpsDWjrwQ6hCeo R/ZStqn2UEBSd5G99BFfffgWOlOTd/QfMYZdV6F+Y7oTvzOe/fkaW5RJQ9hqVcIMFps1+R JdBSleuAu+jaBMredwePv1iwKPIzP6g= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-54-mI4lHDPiOqemtA4ShyHXRA-1; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 20:55:01 -0500 X-MC-Unique: mI4lHDPiOqemtA4ShyHXRA-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: mI4lHDPiOqemtA4ShyHXRA Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E0FF19560AA; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 01:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from llong-thinkpadp16vgen1.westford.csb (unknown [10.22.88.114]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAC6180034C; Sat, 25 Jan 2025 01:54:56 +0000 (UTC) From: Waiman Long To: John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Boyd , Feng Tang , "Paul E. McKenney" , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Clark Williams , Steven Rostedt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Waiman Long Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] clocksource: Use pr_info() for "Checking clocksource synchronization" message Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 20:54:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20250125015442.3740588-1-longman@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 The "Checking clocksource synchronization" message is normally printed when clocksource_verify_percpu() is called for a given clocksource if both the CLOCK_SOURCE_UNSTABLE and CLOCK_SOURCE_VERIFY_PERCPU flags are set. It is an informational message and so pr_info() should be used instead of pr_warn(). Signed-off-by: Waiman Long Acked-by: John Stultz Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney --- kernel/time/clocksource.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c index 7304d7cf47f2..77d9566d3aa6 100644 --- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c +++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c @@ -382,7 +382,8 @@ void clocksource_verify_percpu(struct clocksource *cs) return; } testcpu = smp_processor_id(); - pr_warn("Checking clocksource %s synchronization from CPU %d to CPUs %*pbl.\n", cs->name, testcpu, cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_chosen)); + pr_info("Checking clocksource %s synchronization from CPU %d to CPUs %*pbl.\n", + cs->name, testcpu, cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_chosen)); for_each_cpu(cpu, &cpus_chosen) { if (cpu == testcpu) continue; -- 2.47.1