From: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Clarify wake_up_q()'s write to task->wake_q.next
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 20:53:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250129-sched-wakeup-prettier-v1-1-2f51f5f663fa@google.com> (raw)
Clarify that wake_up_q() does an atomic write to task->wake_q.next, after
which a concurrent __wake_q_add() can immediately overwrite
task->wake_q.next again.
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
---
a minor change; I figured we should at least be using WRITE_ONCE() here,
and I might as well change the comments a little bit while I'm touching
this
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 9142a0394d46605e96e10cef97cce02d741f6c93..ce64652858703826dca510479f563a28c2fb2405 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1063,9 +1063,10 @@ void wake_up_q(struct wake_q_head *head)
struct task_struct *task;
task = container_of(node, struct task_struct, wake_q);
- /* Task can safely be re-inserted now: */
node = node->next;
- task->wake_q.next = NULL;
+ /* pairs with cmpxchg_relaxed() in __wake_q_add() */
+ WRITE_ONCE(task->wake_q.next, NULL);
+ /* Task can safely be re-inserted now. */
/*
* wake_up_process() executes a full barrier, which pairs with
---
base-commit: 05dbaf8dd8bf537d4b4eb3115ab42a5fb40ff1f5
change-id: 20250129-sched-wakeup-prettier-c28762d8deee
--
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
next reply other threads:[~2025-01-29 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-29 19:53 Jann Horn [this message]
2025-02-03 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-02-08 14:51 ` [tip: sched/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250129-sched-wakeup-prettier-v1-1-2f51f5f663fa@google.com \
--to=jannh@google.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®