From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Varshini Rajendran" <varshini.rajendran@microchip.com>,
"Csókás, Bence" <csokas.bence@prolan.hu>
Subject: drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c:244: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'pclk_div' not described in 'atmel_qspi_pcal'
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 17:31:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202501311707.Ltj0qXse-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
Hi Tudor,
FYI, the error/warning still remains.
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head: 69e858e0b8b2ea07759e995aa383e8780d9d140c
commit: 5af42209a4d23adc9a09e59e586d1b47fef3cc86 spi: atmel-quadspi: Add support for sama7g5 QSPI
date: 6 weeks ago
config: mips-randconfig-r024-20220830 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250131/202501311707.Ltj0qXse-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250131/202501311707.Ltj0qXse-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202501311707.Ltj0qXse-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c:244: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'pclk_div' not described in 'atmel_qspi_pcal'
>> drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c:244: warning: Excess struct member 'pclkdiv' description in 'atmel_qspi_pcal'
vim +244 drivers/spi/atmel-quadspi.c
232
233 /* Use PIO for small transfers. */
234 #define ATMEL_QSPI_DMA_MIN_BYTES 16
235 /**
236 * struct atmel_qspi_pcal - Pad Calibration Clock Division
237 * @pclk_rate: peripheral clock rate.
238 * @pclkdiv: calibration clock division. The clock applied to the calibration
239 * cell is divided by pclkdiv + 1.
240 */
241 struct atmel_qspi_pcal {
242 u32 pclk_rate;
243 u8 pclk_div;
> 244 };
245
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2025-01-31 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202501311707.Ltj0qXse-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=csokas.bence@prolan.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@microchip.com \
--cc=varshini.rajendran@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®