From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 03/11] KVM: nVMX: Allow emulating RDPID on behalf of L2
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 17:55:10 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250201015518.689704-4-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250201015518.689704-1-seanjc@google.com>
Return X86EMUL_CONTINUE instead X86EMUL_UNHANDLEABLE when emulating RDPID
on behalf of L2 and L1 _does_ expose RDPID/RDTSCP to L2. When RDPID
emulation was added by commit fb6d4d340e05 ("KVM: x86: emulate RDPID"),
KVM incorrectly allowed emulation by default. Commit 07721feee46b ("KVM:
nVMX: Don't emulate instructions in guest mode") fixed that flaw, but
missed that RDPID emulation was relying on the common return path to allow
emulation on behalf of L2.
Fixes: 07721feee46b ("KVM: nVMX: Don't emulate instructions in guest mode")
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 3654c08cfa31..9773287acade 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -8049,18 +8049,19 @@ int vmx_check_intercept(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct vmcs12 *vmcs12 = get_vmcs12(vcpu);
switch (info->intercept) {
- /*
- * RDPID causes #UD if disabled through secondary execution controls.
- * Because it is marked as EmulateOnUD, we need to intercept it here.
- * Note, RDPID is hidden behind ENABLE_RDTSCP.
- */
case x86_intercept_rdpid:
+ /*
+ * RDPID causes #UD if not enabled through secondary execution
+ * controls (ENABLE_RDTSCP). Note, the implicit MSR access to
+ * TSC_AUX is NOT subject to interception, i.e. checking only
+ * the dedicated execution control is architecturally correct.
+ */
if (!nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_RDTSCP)) {
exception->vector = UD_VECTOR;
exception->error_code_valid = false;
return X86EMUL_PROPAGATE_FAULT;
}
- break;
+ return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
case x86_intercept_in:
case x86_intercept_ins:
--
2.48.1.362.g079036d154-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-01 1:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-01 1:55 [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: x86: Fix emulation of (some) L2 instructions Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] KVM: nVMX: Check PAUSE_EXITING, not BUS_LOCK_DETECTION, on PAUSE emulation Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] KVM: nSVM: Pass next RIP, not current RIP, for nested VM-Exit on emulation Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 1:55 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-02-01 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] KVM: nVMX: Emulate HLT in L2 if it's not intercepted Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] KVM: nVMX: Consolidate missing X86EMUL_INTERCEPTED logic in L2 emulation Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] KVM: x86: Plumb the src/dst operand types through to .check_intercept() Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] KVM: x86: Plumb the emulator's starting RIP into nested intercept checks Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] KVM: x86: Add a #define for the architectural max instruction length Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] KVM: nVMX: Allow the caller to provide instruction length on nested VM-Exit Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] KVM: nVMX: Synthesize nested VM-Exit for supported emulation intercepts Sean Christopherson
2025-02-01 1:55 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] KVM: selftests: Add a nested (forced) emulation intercept test for x86 Sean Christopherson
2025-02-28 17:06 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] KVM: x86: Fix emulation of (some) L2 instructions Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250201015518.689704-4-seanjc@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®