From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5037B4A00 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 23:31:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738711892; cv=none; b=CvOv8LY8Gskob5APxF7Ezgwa9GqpxACrBC3mq65TIQEIApKASJZF/pRKmkPWVu7kUjQ76bIjTP+xRQAxtRmL/Jj0M2AkxH2hP3Gt1+sJ0UXyw1CmqecCNlbQn5mmww10TsVvONRKr0veVqcIUUhTOJP9yXW0T2hG/mYAjkiPOWs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738711892; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ssdWvG/AFYhoAwSEBluCH0CKbVRI0INkog1PqwbG+i4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=camP8i2EL3DxWOtFyR2T1fgJ8KlOgmFmzMB+Rjo+qGy8wRj//OrmuWmpabs24Fyvhjfi774ZnX+lAHAy9quoeFIckBCzrLbBgK5jno2PMayg5lYi1nIQPdOR3ua+VD7MM3I2irmgcN70LSlkOFdc6Ckb8DsRQjtMmWHAH821hY8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AiIaix8t; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AiIaix8t" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A61B5C4CEDF; Tue, 4 Feb 2025 23:31:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738711891; bh=ssdWvG/AFYhoAwSEBluCH0CKbVRI0INkog1PqwbG+i4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AiIaix8t8Cs2XQhzKukHWqmac/PV1nQ+M+uHgcuGGziuzfxpfi88nl5mW94Uv15SM d6hNcd6gdHQBKTdrtBR4nSJfeE6x4Elyv1cCnM6ixDRB1vbK7m1+djL4LJWTKFUohI ZesZcMuwGq34NkFI9kb9Jb2jpQmeu+qXyQx6S50yzsaywA8pkwQrZOXseIJClYg+CZ dYnJCjQCttN04ZkY1l2jE0U/jNC2b2ZvRp1uHDBb3qkdU8vdHhnxgTgdFqvOgpXrZr ZLWOf0qlj9l47qXe7FXWDstBlWcQti+iRY2Aa8PUb2XHEcfZ8Zs3g4HOg524ILKxkf fQjSOwGSnNlgA== Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 23:31:28 +0000 From: Conor Dooley To: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, etienne.buira@free.fr Cc: florian.fainelli@broadcom.com Subject: Re: Kconfig condition on BCM2835_TIMER (and others) Message-ID: <20250204-papaya-grudge-2b7dd5c73917@spud> References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s1c1F3TJ/4o5Hn8p" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --s1c1F3TJ/4o5Hn8p Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 01:44:05PM +0100, Etienne Buira wrote: > Resend with corrected email address. >=20 > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 01:39:33PM +0100, Etienne Buira wrote: > > Hi all, > >=20 > > I want to build a kernel for Raspberry pi 4B, which, according to the > > dtb, has a bc2835-system-timer. This device is handled by > > drivers/clocksource/bcm2835_timer.c, which is built depending on > > CONFIG_BCM2835_TIMER. > >=20 > > However, the config option is guarded by "if COMPILE_TEST" condition. > >=20 > > Shouldn't that condition be ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST (ie be selectable on > > arm64 builds)? Perhaps, but I'd wonder why arm64 and arm32 are being treated differently. Florian, why's there no select on arm64 when the BCM2835 family option is enabled? --s1c1F3TJ/4o5Hn8p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZ6KjUAAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0n+wAP9d8CPONamCjleKLa2drLg1k0RhSEtpTHLWu02j6++5sQD/TENpiWhPgYYi eu3ikgQrCIqHsgXk+SaLdg6iTlMAfAw= =sbh4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s1c1F3TJ/4o5Hn8p--