From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C32421C192; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738749781; cv=none; b=kRX0J/kjc8jY/754v6SGkI/TdPo7XR8GyGGrzhUUs/kJNJLGn5rEQQ9dCkaUeGTm+d14ujHAfDzo6OQA8/VqV/3rtTL1zKzsFjKnH8t4L3cmJHzsbptnCVlAzraXrOWlfoD80Zt5EKlcWTF9NTDqKduLzpkl2hB1T77mKkKwuQA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738749781; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eEIXyeTqTciBT2AyEUTZ/fjpAhvMvA/BpJ5cjCaSlWg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IZMHcKA8yvofx3f3dYmV7vdkJnuOkG/8BUtdOo3C5CNA/nPmUUIFNpo44ZHaS3m7JehzSqzp9Ix7h3fUY/zOPiSyfOlIBHl1+gMUfvgCP87oM9b5TE8wOoLBha0eKOymDK8ZMYPdHwpMWiwnweQ0wbO9QGsNAmO2zl61ThQY1u0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=FKjLv2HM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="FKjLv2HM" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D856C4CED1; Wed, 5 Feb 2025 10:02:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738749780; bh=eEIXyeTqTciBT2AyEUTZ/fjpAhvMvA/BpJ5cjCaSlWg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FKjLv2HMDz9R+BWcXt4qxKdw53xV2avVQC59yLi1c8YDWn6AAdoP4QsnmmnTxOCpj SA73vFXAmw8P8aIlStVwpkZn7zzQ746wFQvRHlSQxOu3NbIy5YRWig3pD/1bENc+yz CmVSMutzkDjUwnAwKv2U3zbEPm7BnMhwxTdxo/hyzIxG1YXZWrZV7pxb8fiQJCpUCd 6TC9vKqi0P8cA2iiCqCgNjfRoYLO1sOnIcK6lOBiNVh21SdZwYhBFeIyyDgsHbzn8p HDrfEQwcdIm6T5tLT0mn8gqLRpkAi3E0RRlh2I//FVOAvOtYJwk4+gXjVJYJY78pr6 LEIq9Cg3BZaYg== Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 11:02:56 +0100 From: Christian Brauner To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with Linus' tree Message-ID: <20250205-mundwinkel-lausbub-57cdb259c734@brauner> References: <20250205093823.4567f09f@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250205093823.4567f09f@canb.auug.org.au> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 09:38:23AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got conflicts in: > > fs/dcache.c > fs/erofs/zdata.c > fs/gfs2/quota.c > include/linux/lockref.h > > between commits: > > 4b193fa75eff ("lockref: remove lockref_put_not_zero") > 6d2868d5b6fc ("lockref: use bool for false/true returns") > 25d8060418b4 ("lockref: drop superfluous externs") > 63440d1c6dd1 ("lockref: add a lockref_init helper") > 8c32b87c4f88 ("dcache: use lockref_init for d_lockref") > 6f86f1465b59 ("erofs: use lockref_init for pcl->lockref") > 3e652eba244c ("gfs2: use lockref_init for qd_lockref") > > from Linus' tree (plus further commits affecting these same files in other > trees) and commits: > > 74b5da771c89 ("lockref: remove lockref_put_not_zero") > 57bd981b2db7 ("lockref: use bool for false/true returns") > 80e2823cbe59 ("lockref: drop superfluous externs") > 5f0c395edf59 ("lockref: add a lockref_init helper") > 24706068b7b6 ("dcache: use lockref_init for d_lockref") > 160a93170d53 ("erofs: use lockref_init for pcl->lockref") > 0ef3858b15e3 ("gfs2: use lockref_init for qd_lockref") > > from the vfs-brauner tree. > > I fixed it up (these commits are just duplicates, so I used the former > vresions of these files) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now > fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts > should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is > submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with > the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > Please clean up the vfs-brauner tree. Done and new tree pushed. Thanks! Christian