From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C1FC2417EF for ; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 12:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738931447; cv=none; b=CanJqdcOvs79A4fV8DgmUw4gLupEhkFZLbsd9O4Qfh2cLE8K6qxKrNWjeb4P6kzGAU92UgxmwZa8oPxwdlRIzKGFH3bJG4K9nVPfLGUVstMe83jYjAu08Lg5cHCdv5e2senU/wFrPs/Ur4AG0WS5O3gaZOeZ9ycuuyE2Rwvd0HU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738931447; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jYlfBbDJsAc5w5J0+1fMOLp8nO8K5+iaVrHcbx13aqE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=fH2eadjoEJHQHQuLTVqvKo5aBC8fUM1bYnP0RxT1Actabt+wFFeHkGub5hy2SpbzSjBg1MwfAm5QpC85pMBgU3J6PIz4h5emN2cQXqZQe4qZKeaUDrgGLIIRBQ+GUGNs5/EVCj4spvszXPCxRYUfS3BpYDtoiu5gTd32oN/Cay8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=pb1Dskyp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="pb1Dskyp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=jYlfBbDJsAc5w5J0+1fMOLp8nO8K5+iaVrHcbx13aqE=; b=pb1Dskypva83a5E9QnjuO6dTHg +TzhvGnAqBJNKC6UGSY3YgTZA+4c6Aw66TNhL5hXHAgtYkk+kHj1Y/JvidyIhSFyHB4G1iLLWAF3o XfDAVyIFiiekBKtcV9sKNHwmaBsLUK1Tr8Dz1czeEfbEayVDt+qQoMFtszNChG3IPwMX6jeekX/J3 C0Nfaw0K+Y0Zfv+zlmP+pVnBO/y9FVH+pJbePC9eR1hcZi3w8hf6YumZ9x+5qnRdXQebbib9YWcw7 fn67Z/Jhv3mOrAN22hzW6gpxMPDEa43h6DF62IYohyPDcQ7sB4g6Msq9E61iTxYCEanXTA78idnY6 ZOb6T7ew==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tgNUz-0000000HAhK-1KUo; Fri, 07 Feb 2025 12:30:21 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DE50B300310; Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:30:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 13:30:20 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Breno Leitao Cc: mingo@kernel.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, qyousef@layalina.io, chris.hyser@oracle.com, patrick.bellasi@matbug.net, pjt@google.com, pavel@ucw.cz, qperret@google.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, joshdon@google.com, timj@gnu.org, kprateek.nayak@amd.com, yu.c.chen@intel.com, youssefesmat@chromium.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, efault@gmx.de, tglx@linutronix.de, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] sched/fair: Add lag based placement Message-ID: <20250207123020.GJ14028@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20230531115839.089944915@infradead.org> <20230531124603.794929315@infradead.org> <20250207-petite-eminent-husky-7d1704@leitao> <20250207111141.GD7145@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20250207-tunneling-tested-koel-c59d33@leitao> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250207-tunneling-tested-koel-c59d33@leitao> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:25:02AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote: > I haven't seen this patch in stable. Is it queue up for the next > submission for stable? It's not yet queued, up. I meant to do that this week, but 'stuff' kept getting in between. I'll try and get it pushed into tip/sched/urgent this seekend somewhere -- but it is unlikely to make -rc2 at this pace.