From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A0021C9E0 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 12:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739189190; cv=none; b=qAbJWR3v+qmEO1r6ITaXSjWoIZiI/SjXbpvDvK5WSZ+xIPubiRBssPDFtmdyBeekOMaGAjkwQp8T2I2Pl9UjXv6ZfbDj91NGbZ9Xxr01mUM2IxSEZHdtjEg9tUJgi6LcE4ubns6j58R3ODXyJf6CGO67e7VRSZaoy3J7N41yvqo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739189190; c=relaxed/simple; bh=H5c23d9e/m7VveiOFBzA2gzMxqciYhqAmG4A2quPJp8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IU/oRoPVVl7jZYjUEctV9h/cDfNtWNsPfXeVjR3YN4M1mJ89uzOzRdioUn9n8HpkxObr2V0NFWqz2nkmGVff9nX+Zq3r/pFgxZmc3mbRMv3taGPGRpfJ7O7GdK7S58BDthsi1JkPZS51c6v4H4ppOiTN1kMj8k04wDPNsB32A8o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=awVn53XD; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=xIInMNod; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="awVn53XD"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="xIInMNod" Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 13:06:25 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1739189187; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2mynsei9YosbBjePqOYbXOxcLMlabRINg90zzUmsPO4=; b=awVn53XDZRY0RLPVlviskbG703fT2Lfh8BHbmol1LEW/XHPc36+0ALXZuA+4gEIWwhef0h In4PLDL1RdfVpR3iQcIpI38Q5zgvMXE4B0jGdvMOCkrmKk8k8tc+mt0xjvC4vlO/fWRbR+ tnTXEjoau902SGo/iwg3Ub4/LxulLfK5qS0mmzT9OIw2mCMrskEOr1Wa9byvmEU7YlTPjR 9C35O0tHzCH7B4U1YcJHsOkVJJKFVoqUo+rzBFK7F3m4G8mY4Wt9DRM3jvXyvC/+vJiGTC s1v7xMPo2zAGLcsp6SleGcRTYO45+p3WOnkPpU2AFlVYm4uRaCz8I7EG9Xy09g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1739189187; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2mynsei9YosbBjePqOYbXOxcLMlabRINg90zzUmsPO4=; b=xIInMNodOdhcYWNE9Eyc7N6Tjdp2K2PsYW2QqZeduEJXoO462vHDFet8N98d6s5IXPuzJM W/FGeSijdonuuCAg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen Cc: Ben Segall , Catalin Marinas , Dietmar Eggemann , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Mel Gorman , Peter Zijlstra , Shrikanth Hegde , Steven Rostedt , Valentin Schneider , Vincent Guittot , Will Deacon , Josh Poimboeuf , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] x86: Rely on generic printing of preemption model. Message-ID: <20250210120625.nNiVxgOJ@linutronix.de> References: <20250203141632.440554-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20250203141632.440554-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250203141632.440554-8-bigeasy@linutronix.de> On 2025-02-03 15:16:30 [+0100], To linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org wrote: > After __die_header(), __die_body() is always invoked. There we have > show_regs() -> show_regs_print_info() which prints the current > preemption model. > Remove it from the initial line. > > Cc: Josh Poimboeuf > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Ingo Molnar > Cc: Borislav Petkov > Cc: Dave Hansen > Cc: x86@kernel.org > Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Is it okay, to route this via the sched tree? Sebastian