From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4E802528F5 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739197513; cv=none; b=mxP8aosArUSZWvR/H1Axp+5BwCls+HGgMtJH0StzJkT8ITEmsXgJd5zIwocjPGMWd3c+HkfRB+KCPuF3wzI5XRgvOmrbExb/RcRoeXqcckcuwGotU7X1X4Uim2rFT+hnms35mYotXKjeUbYqRPMqT5Tm3kSM9qmcUHkuKOZ+Y5w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739197513; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EnW58wjUZzLHH0kmASDa4WNdQfuc4EB1UDxkeEIolzk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=izkeil3i5e6Cm+eGhP5WvT3P3KbLLTxGUgKCZl+lEti20tzh4aXiEvRNuuAXLM5Pdy/E3huRars99DR/xTt9tyVsbTHUEOusPIxNKKW0Nm4v65NbdZbJ4UMEkRv76rLMuBtPh+OomR8Xwkl18uUetUMJU3s/d/ejDQMPAwEhMAo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=bqMvMye0; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=/6xCl8BO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="bqMvMye0"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="/6xCl8BO" Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 15:25:08 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1739197510; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1vWLuCbK7H0/XbL5hiAH8Qspdgx/y77kys0v1c8WNbE=; b=bqMvMye06P0vCJgC9iRO7t+cH0gAejDkGd+gzF69uFUC8DtFGyw8SpZJWpqi1/ZM6+D0z5 tdk2Uia5EtUBjbkSHNT0Uzu/ePwnfmO4gcVrq2st9cayG38Q6Mi8LrBuHwCtltLZPOBN6h DBNyxCGiFshaCz/aZnQtWpSPjys5hsaFMoJ3WVvGihordxfn6NeaWHPN9lEe11hYC3JPFp ro2G3c2z5al9NnxBnuGS/qdrcVAgEJvBPIwZ4n97nXc0Tlvhu/Y6g7GA4nxM5IW5kuYJyU qFpqaXwXlf3V9tYDsqI1b3ec2bMStL5kdnV9bOuwr3zkJLG7ol98DQTcbJj+/w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1739197510; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=1vWLuCbK7H0/XbL5hiAH8Qspdgx/y77kys0v1c8WNbE=; b=/6xCl8BOB85LeK7geGOncv1o6lssisxynRkhnUg55mat89XZIT/oSjc5swWLnLOhxTLVrE dCd12ZXpJNASGuAA== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Shrikanth Hegde Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Ben Segall , Catalin Marinas , Dietmar Eggemann , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Mel Gorman , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Thomas Gleixner , Valentin Schneider , Vincent Guittot , Will Deacon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] sched: Add a generic function to return the preemption string. Message-ID: <20250210142508.vmMQUDkJ@linutronix.de> References: <20250203141632.440554-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20250203141632.440554-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <0d4418ab-d531-413c-bbbd-6c97ea320490@linux.ibm.com> <20250210105240.FTbUbs_F@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 2025-02-10 19:51:33 [+0530], Shrikanth Hegde wrote: > No No. That's not what i meant. > > I was saying, as peter mentioned in the previous discussion, can we put > something like below in changelog/comment for a easier understanding.? Ah. Okay, sure. I didn't realize anyone was asking but for this. > " > RT+DYN: PREEMPT_{RT,(dyn_mode)} > RT+LAZY: PREEMPT_{RT,LAZY} > RT+FULL: PREEMPT_RT > > DYN: PREEMPT_(dyn_mode) > FULL: PREEMPT > LAZY: PREEMPTLAZY > VOLUNTARY: VOLUNTARY > NONE: NONE > " Sebastian