mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] posix-timers: Use RCU in posix_timer_add()
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2025 13:59:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250214135911.2037402-3-edumazet@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250214135911.2037402-1-edumazet@google.com>

If many posix timers are hashed in posix_timers_hashtable,
hash_lock can be held for long durations.

This can be really bad in some cases as Thomas
explained in https://lore.kernel.org/all/87ednpyyeo.ffs@tglx/

We can perform all searches under RCU, then acquire
the lock only when there is a good chance to need it,
and after cpu caches were populated.

I also added a cond_resched() in the possible long loop.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
---
 kernel/time/posix-timers.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
index 204a351a2fd3..dd2f9016d3dc 100644
--- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c
@@ -112,7 +112,19 @@ static int posix_timer_add(struct k_itimer *timer)
 
 		head = &posix_timers_hashtable[hash(sig, id)];
 
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		if (__posix_timers_find(head, sig, id)) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			cond_resched();
+			continue;
+		}
+		rcu_read_unlock();
 		spin_lock(&hash_lock);
+		/*
+		 * We must perform the lookup under hash_lock protection
+		 * because another thread could have used the same id.
+		 * This is very unlikely, but possible.
+		 */
 		if (!__posix_timers_find(head, sig, id)) {
 			hlist_add_head_rcu(&timer->t_hash, head);
 			spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
-- 
2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-14 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-14 13:59 [PATCH 0/2] posix-timers: Reduce spinlock contention Eric Dumazet
2025-02-14 13:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] posix-timers: Make next_posix_timer_id an atomic_t Eric Dumazet
2025-02-14 13:59 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2025-02-14 16:59   ` [PATCH 2/2] posix-timers: Use RCU in posix_timer_add() David Laight
2025-02-14 17:48     ` Eric Dumazet
2025-02-17 19:25       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-17 19:24   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-18 14:16     ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250214135911.2037402-3-edumazet@google.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®