From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEBAE269AF9 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2025 14:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739890163; cv=none; b=BJeXaxzyzPhMC6Y8NW9fQ67d9GEV0pSMXgTVb3jXUmZrnfimK9H+gBjxa0zHTTK9QloeH0wNT1HdCayuBbXA7pTh57Wtw9kF+S7pW+QIqwBclqsCjAHU8WxZS1h0ZtwG6JGpi078xtl8lHlEW9Kyzje+c84fumXWbib3wAKiEU0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739890163; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EoFCNMATQP3Q9pMrw/bMv7YovslbUB9wfmbqPQ09s10=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LBofn+8SLO7CZzom4pJ3P3payyad51TF6SE/w1e3kDKF5ngFhnbiuER0D5lYRIpHlgFicvoQShGBHB7C5+93+w9iPJwNz47JGdQoL2J7cZ3nZ+XRw7B+dLqCYA/nxQoayLI73faHGMepvwCBHMRgP91K3OUlSNDP49hLdpwXOz0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=ghV3OEoC; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=MmFO/Pi6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ghV3OEoC"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="MmFO/Pi6" Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:49:18 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1739890159; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BfQaGrORdum9vGG5fQzt3Nbocsm7WjhndHQi5585VyI=; b=ghV3OEoCYxMjCHDtgSFEhjxZv1ibhMuYkRHOxDJq2VplgZAtywfWj8WmCnSa3yDGpB0T0g VNhhNu9b3kg7vuio7krvuQc+f7QR/MMXKHFkc4m8tnD/z9n7XPl+ZRr/lP460r1tXT08D9 GdiIYiZ+qr4pSkvQgefhQt0cCJVdEXROSICZP7Q0/RyF8+dqLg5erIxVZ5Zu1Zm2N65k+C HTEjGpnI6eOLIbbzpbk3VHHFuOSoLcg8RCg/ayhui5AGJMSZobtQKI0YRa2MjV7XlXVS6V b38yrd7jl00YfpljHwFtjvTvDqf0IF8YUKBkO5DtvBfcRKxU4LC62oWWN40hfw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1739890159; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=BfQaGrORdum9vGG5fQzt3Nbocsm7WjhndHQi5585VyI=; b=MmFO/Pi6ESc16H/nlsONL22mJ4HvnJjwo72oTws3KYtfdvo8NHcHtxfXYo6KD0aSzGCCXB r5iogN97eZXPWFBg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: kernel test robot Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, Petr Pavlu , "H. Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , Ingo Molnar , Josh Poimboeuf , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [x86] 66fbf67705: kernel-selftests.kvm.hardware_disable_test.fail Message-ID: <20250218144918.Rl33HhXh@linutronix.de> References: <202502140800.ebac2328-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202502140800.ebac2328-lkp@intel.com> On 2025-02-14 10:03:18 [+0800], kernel test robot wrote: > kernel test robot noticed "kernel-selftests.kvm.hardware_disable_test.fail" on: > > commit: 66fbf677051818b9b5339fa8bfeac1b2e288efa5 ("x86: Use RCU in all users of __module_address().") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master > > [test failed on linux-next/master df5d6180169ae06a2eac57e33b077ad6f6252440] > > # timeout set to 120 > # selftests: kvm: hardware_disable_test > # Random seed: 0x6b8b4567 > # > not ok 73 selftests: kvm: hardware_disable_test # TIMEOUT 120 seconds I've been playing with that. It completed after ~45secs. The linked dmesg had also mmu_stress_test timed out but it completed here, too. I had a timeout in access_tracking_perf_test and memslot_perf_test. The box is very sluggish. LOCKDEP, KASAN and maybe UBSAN cause that. I would say the commit in question is innocent. Sebastian