mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] fprobe: Fix accounting of when to unregister from function graph
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:42:54 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220134254.9b4edb4353e137bf1bbc5713@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250219220511.392563510@goodmis.org>

On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 17:04:40 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> 
> When adding a new fprobe, it will update the function hash to the
> functions the fprobe is attached to and register with function graph to
> have it call the registered functions. The fprobe_graph_active variable
> keeps track of the number of fprobes that are using function graph.
> 
> If two fprobes attach to the same function, it increments the
> fprobe_graph_active for each of them. But when they are removed, the first
> fprobe to be removed will see that the function it is attached to is also
> used by another fprobe and it will not remove that function from
> function_graph. The logic will skip decrementing the fprobe_graph_active
> variable.
> 
> This causes the fprobe_graph_active variable to not go to zero when all
> fprobes are removed, and in doing so it does not unregister from
> function graph. As the fgraph ops hash will now be empty, and an empty
> filter hash means all functions are enabled, this triggers function graph
> to add a callback to the fprobe infrastructure for every function!
> 
>  # echo "f:myevent1 kernel_clone" >> /sys/kernel/tracing/dynamic_events
>  # echo "f:myevent2 kernel_clone%return" >> /sys/kernel/tracing/dynamic_events
>  # cat /sys/kernel/tracing/enabled_functions
> kernel_clone (1)           	tramp: 0xffffffffc0024000 (ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60) ->ftrace_graph_func+0x0/0x60
> 
>  # > /sys/kernel/tracing/dynamic_events
>  # cat /sys/kernel/tracing/enabled_functions
> trace_initcall_start_cb (1)             tramp: 0xffffffffc0026000 (function_trace_call+0x0/0x170) ->function_trace_call+0x0/0x170
> run_init_process (1)            tramp: 0xffffffffc0026000 (function_trace_call+0x0/0x170) ->function_trace_call+0x0/0x170
> try_to_run_init_process (1)             tramp: 0xffffffffc0026000 (function_trace_call+0x0/0x170) ->function_trace_call+0x0/0x170
> x86_pmu_show_pmu_cap (1)                tramp: 0xffffffffc0026000 (function_trace_call+0x0/0x170) ->function_trace_call+0x0/0x170
> cleanup_rapl_pmus (1)                   tramp: 0xffffffffc0026000 (function_trace_call+0x0/0x170) ->function_trace_call+0x0/0x170
> uncore_free_pcibus_map (1)              tramp: 0xffffffffc0026000 (function_trace_call+0x0/0x170) ->function_trace_call+0x0/0x170
> uncore_types_exit (1)                   tramp: 0xffffffffc0026000 (function_trace_call+0x0/0x170) ->function_trace_call+0x0/0x170
> uncore_pci_exit.part.0 (1)              tramp: 0xffffffffc0026000 (function_trace_call+0x0/0x170) ->function_trace_call+0x0/0x170
> kvm_shutdown (1)                tramp: 0xffffffffc0026000 (function_trace_call+0x0/0x170) ->function_trace_call+0x0/0x170
> vmx_dump_msrs (1)               tramp: 0xffffffffc0026000 (function_trace_call+0x0/0x170) ->function_trace_call+0x0/0x170
> [..]
> 
>  # cat /sys/kernel/tracing/enabled_functions | wc -l
> 54702
> 
> If a fprobe is being removed and all its functions are also traced by
> other fprobes, still decrement the fprobe_graph_active counter.
> 

This looks good to me.

Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

And please push this series via your branch because the selftest
updates should cover the series.

Thanks!

> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 4346ba1604093 ("fprobe: Rewrite fprobe on function-graph tracer")
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250217114918.10397-A-hca@linux.ibm.com/
> Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> Changes since v1: https://lore.kernel.org/20250218193126.619197190@goodmis.org
> 
> - Move the check into fprobe_graph_remove_ips() to keep it matching
>   with fprobe_graph_add_ips() (Masami Hiramatsu)
> 
>  kernel/trace/fprobe.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> index 62e8f7d56602..33082c4e8154 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/fprobe.c
> @@ -407,7 +407,8 @@ static void fprobe_graph_remove_ips(unsigned long *addrs, int num)
>  	if (!fprobe_graph_active)
>  		unregister_ftrace_graph(&fprobe_graph_ops);
>  
> -	ftrace_set_filter_ips(&fprobe_graph_ops.ops, addrs, num, 1, 0);
> +	if (num)
> +		ftrace_set_filter_ips(&fprobe_graph_ops.ops, addrs, num, 1, 0);
>  }
>  
>  static int symbols_cmp(const void *a, const void *b)
> @@ -677,8 +678,7 @@ int unregister_fprobe(struct fprobe *fp)
>  	}
>  	del_fprobe_hash(fp);
>  
> -	if (count)
> -		fprobe_graph_remove_ips(addrs, count);
> +	fprobe_graph_remove_ips(addrs, count);
>  
>  	kfree_rcu(hlist_array, rcu);
>  	fp->hlist_array = NULL;
> -- 
> 2.47.2
> 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-20  4:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-19 22:04 [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: Fix fprobe with function graph accounting Steven Rostedt
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ftrace: Fix accounting of adding subops to a manager ops Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  6:58   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-20 20:06     ` Steven Rostedt
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ftrace: Do not add duplicate entries in subops " Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  6:59   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] fprobe: Always unregister fgraph function from ops Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  4:41   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] fprobe: Fix accounting of when to unregister from function graph Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20  4:42   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2025-02-19 22:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] selftests/ftrace: Update fprobe test to check enabled_functions file Steven Rostedt
2025-02-20 11:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] ftrace: Fix fprobe with function graph accounting Heiko Carstens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250220134254.9b4edb4353e137bf1bbc5713@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome