From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com, Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/30] KVM: TDX: Add placeholders for TDX VM/vCPU structures
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:05:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250220170604.2279312-15-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250220170604.2279312-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Add TDX's own VM and vCPU structures as placeholder to manage and run
TDX guests. Also add helper functions to check whether a VM/vCPU is
TDX or normal VMX one, and add helpers to convert between TDX VM/vCPU
and KVM VM/vCPU.
TDX protects guest VMs from malicious host. Unlike VMX guests, TDX
guests are crypto-protected. KVM cannot access TDX guests' memory and
vCPU states directly. Instead, TDX requires KVM to use a set of TDX
architecture-defined firmware APIs (a.k.a TDX module SEAMCALLs) to
manage and run TDX guests.
In fact, the way to manage and run TDX guests and normal VMX guests are
quite different. Because of that, the current structures
('struct kvm_vmx' and 'struct vcpu_vmx') to manage VMX guests are not
quite suitable for TDX guests. E.g., the majority of the members of
'struct vcpu_vmx' don't apply to TDX guests.
Introduce TDX's own VM and vCPU structures ('struct kvm_tdx' and 'struct
vcpu_tdx' respectively) for KVM to manage and run TDX guests. And
instead of building TDX's VM and vCPU structures based on VMX's, build
them directly based on 'struct kvm'.
As a result, TDX and VMX guests will have different VM size and vCPU
size/alignment.
Currently, kvm_arch_alloc_vm() uses 'kvm_x86_ops::vm_size' to allocate
enough space for the VM structure when creating guest. With TDX guests,
ideally, KVM should allocate the VM structure based on the VM type so
that the precise size can be allocated for VMX and TDX guests. But this
requires more extensive code change. For now, simply choose the maximum
size of 'struct kvm_tdx' and 'struct kvm_vmx' for VM structure
allocation for both VMX and TDX guests. This would result in small
memory waste for each VM which has smaller VM structure size but this is
acceptable.
For simplicity, use the same way for vCPU allocation too. Otherwise KVM
would need to maintain a separate 'kvm_vcpu_cache' for each VM type.
Note, updating the 'vt_x86_ops::vm_size' needs to be done before calling
kvm_ops_update(), which copies vt_x86_ops to kvm_x86_ops. However this
happens before TDX module initialization. Therefore theoretically it is
possible that 'kvm_x86_ops::vm_size' is set to size of 'struct kvm_tdx'
(when it's larger) but TDX actually fails to initialize at a later time.
Again the worst case of this is wasting couple of bytes memory for each
VM. KVM could choose to update 'kvm_x86_ops::vm_size' at a later time
depending on TDX's status but that would require base KVM module to
export either kvm_x86_ops or kvm_ops_update().
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
- Make to_kvm_tdx() and to_tdx() private to tdx.c (Francesco, Tony)
- Add pragma poison for to_vmx() (Paolo)
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c | 14 ++++++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
index 97c453187cc1..5c1acc88feef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/main.c
@@ -8,6 +8,39 @@
#include "posted_intr.h"
#include "tdx.h"
+static __init int vt_hardware_setup(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = vmx_hardware_setup();
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Update vt_x86_ops::vm_size here so it is ready before
+ * kvm_ops_update() is called in kvm_x86_vendor_init().
+ *
+ * Note, the actual bringing up of TDX must be done after
+ * kvm_ops_update() because enabling TDX requires enabling
+ * hardware virtualization first, i.e., all online CPUs must
+ * be in post-VMXON state. This means the @vm_size here
+ * may be updated to TDX's size but TDX may fail to enable
+ * at later time.
+ *
+ * The VMX/VT code could update kvm_x86_ops::vm_size again
+ * after bringing up TDX, but this would require exporting
+ * either kvm_x86_ops or kvm_ops_update() from the base KVM
+ * module, which looks overkill. Anyway, the worst case here
+ * is KVM may allocate couple of more bytes than needed for
+ * each VM.
+ */
+ if (enable_tdx)
+ vt_x86_ops.vm_size = max_t(unsigned int, vt_x86_ops.vm_size,
+ sizeof(struct kvm_tdx));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
#define VMX_REQUIRED_APICV_INHIBITS \
(BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_DISABLED) | \
BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_ABSENT) | \
@@ -163,7 +196,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_ops vt_x86_ops __initdata = {
};
struct kvm_x86_init_ops vt_init_ops __initdata = {
- .hardware_setup = vmx_hardware_setup,
+ .hardware_setup = vt_hardware_setup,
.handle_intel_pt_intr = NULL,
.runtime_ops = &vt_x86_ops,
@@ -180,6 +213,7 @@ module_exit(vt_exit);
static int __init vt_init(void)
{
+ unsigned vcpu_size, vcpu_align;
int r;
r = vmx_init();
@@ -191,12 +225,25 @@ static int __init vt_init(void)
if (r)
goto err_tdx_bringup;
+ /*
+ * TDX and VMX have different vCPU structures. Calculate the
+ * maximum size/align so that kvm_init() can use the larger
+ * values to create the kmem_vcpu_cache.
+ */
+ vcpu_size = sizeof(struct vcpu_vmx);
+ vcpu_align = __alignof__(struct vcpu_vmx);
+ if (enable_tdx) {
+ vcpu_size = max_t(unsigned, vcpu_size,
+ sizeof(struct vcpu_tdx));
+ vcpu_align = max_t(unsigned, vcpu_align,
+ __alignof__(struct vcpu_tdx));
+ }
+
/*
* Common KVM initialization _must_ come last, after this, /dev/kvm is
* exposed to userspace!
*/
- r = kvm_init(sizeof(struct vcpu_vmx), __alignof__(struct vcpu_vmx),
- THIS_MODULE);
+ r = kvm_init(vcpu_size, vcpu_align, THIS_MODULE);
if (r)
goto err_kvm_init;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
index 761d3a9cd5c5..a830e9c42bf2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
@@ -5,16 +5,28 @@
#include "capabilities.h"
#include "tdx.h"
+#pragma GCC poison to_vmx
+
#undef pr_fmt
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
-static bool enable_tdx __ro_after_init;
+bool enable_tdx __ro_after_init;
module_param_named(tdx, enable_tdx, bool, 0444);
static enum cpuhp_state tdx_cpuhp_state;
static const struct tdx_sys_info *tdx_sysinfo;
+static __always_inline struct kvm_tdx *to_kvm_tdx(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ return container_of(kvm, struct kvm_tdx, kvm);
+}
+
+static __always_inline struct vcpu_tdx *to_tdx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return container_of(vcpu, struct vcpu_tdx, vcpu);
+}
+
static int tdx_online_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
{
unsigned long flags;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h
index 8aee938a968f..fc013c8816f1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.h
@@ -5,9 +5,46 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_HOST
int tdx_bringup(void);
void tdx_cleanup(void);
+
+extern bool enable_tdx;
+
+struct kvm_tdx {
+ struct kvm kvm;
+ /* TDX specific members follow. */
+};
+
+struct vcpu_tdx {
+ struct kvm_vcpu vcpu;
+ /* TDX specific members follow. */
+};
+
+static inline bool is_td(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ return kvm->arch.vm_type == KVM_X86_TDX_VM;
+}
+
+static inline bool is_td_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ return is_td(vcpu->kvm);
+}
+
#else
static inline int tdx_bringup(void) { return 0; }
static inline void tdx_cleanup(void) {}
+
+#define enable_tdx 0
+
+struct kvm_tdx {
+ struct kvm kvm;
+};
+
+struct vcpu_tdx {
+ struct kvm_vcpu vcpu;
+};
+
+static inline bool is_td(struct kvm *kvm) { return false; }
+static inline bool is_td_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return false; }
+
#endif
#endif
--
2.43.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-20 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-20 17:05 [PATCH v3 00/30] TDX initialization + vCPU/VM creation Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 01/30] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for TDX KeyID management Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 02/30] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for TDX TD creation Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 03/30] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for TDX vCPU creation Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 04/30] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for TDX page cache management Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 05/30] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for TDX VM/vCPU field access Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 06/30] x86/virt/tdx: Add SEAMCALL wrappers for TDX flush operations Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 07/30] x86/virt/tdx: allocate tdx_sys_info in static memory Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 21:59 ` Huang, Kai
2025-02-20 23:37 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 08/30] x86/virt/tdx: Read essential global metadata for KVM Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 09/30] x86/virt/tdx: Add tdx_guest_keyid_alloc/free() to alloc and free TDX guest KeyID Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 10/30] KVM: Export hardware virtualization enabling/disabling functions Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 11/30] KVM: VMX: Refactor VMX module init/exit functions Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 21:55 ` Huang, Kai
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 12/30] KVM: VMX: Initialize TDX during KVM module load Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 23:27 ` Huang, Kai
2025-02-24 18:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-24 21:31 ` Huang, Kai
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 13/30] KVM: TDX: Get TDX global information Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-21 0:12 ` Huang, Kai
2025-02-20 17:05 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 15/30] KVM: TDX: Define TDX architectural definitions Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 16/30] KVM: TDX: Add TDX "architectural" error codes Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 17/30] KVM: TDX: Add helper functions to print TDX SEAMCALL error Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 18/30] KVM: TDX: Add place holder for TDX VM specific mem_enc_op ioctl Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-25 10:50 ` Huang, Kai
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 19/30] KVM: TDX: Get system-wide info about TDX module on initialization Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 20/30] KVM: TDX: create/destroy VM structure Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-21 0:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-21 1:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-22 0:30 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2025-02-22 1:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-24 8:32 ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-21 11:04 ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-21 19:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-02-21 12:25 ` Yan Zhao
2025-02-25 16:24 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 21/30] KVM: TDX: Support per-VM KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS extension check Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 22/30] KVM: x86: expose cpuid_entry2_find for TDX Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 23/30] KVM: TDX: initialize VM with TDX specific parameters Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-21 2:31 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-02-25 17:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 24/30] KVM: TDX: Make pmu_intel.c ignore guest TD case Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:05 ` [PATCH 25/30] KVM: TDX: Don't offline the last cpu of one package when there's TDX guest Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 26/30] KVM: TDX: create/free TDX vcpu structure Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 27/30] KVM: TDX: Do TDX specific vcpu initialization Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 28/30] KVM: x86: Introduce KVM_TDX_GET_CPUID Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 29/30] KVM: x86/mmu: Taking guest pa into consideration when calculate tdp level Paolo Bonzini
2025-02-20 17:06 ` [PATCH 30/30] KVM: TDX: Register TDX host key IDs to cgroup misc controller Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250220170604.2279312-15-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®